Perbandingan Busana Arca Harihara Era Klasik Akhir (Koleksi State Hermitage Museum, Museum Nasional Jakarta, dan Balai Lelang Christie’s)

Waridah Muthi'ah, A. Sachari
{"title":"Perbandingan Busana Arca Harihara Era Klasik Akhir (Koleksi State Hermitage Museum, Museum Nasional Jakarta, dan Balai Lelang Christie’s)","authors":"Waridah Muthi'ah, A. Sachari","doi":"10.33153/glr.v19i1.3533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Harihara is the amalgamation of two great gods in Hinduism, Siva and Vishnu. During the Late Classical Era (Majapahit period, 13th-15th centuries AD) three deification statues which portrayed the kings as Harihara have been found. Out of these three, two of them are not located in Indonesia anymore, one is part of the collection of Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg, and one is in Christie’s Auction Gallery. Since these two statues are not widely known, they are barely mentioned or studied in the field of classical archaeology and art. This research focuses on the physical attributes of those two statues, particularly the clothing elements and divine attributes, in comparation to the deification statue of Raden Wijaya as Harihara, which is originated from Candi Simping and now is located in National Museum, Jakarta. The research was conducted using a qualitative-comparative method with iconographic and historical approach. It is found that while these statues show the amalgamation of Siva and Vishnu’s attributes, the depiction of Harihara in those statues are not exactly following Harihara iconography as regulated in the canons of Silpasastra and Manasara. While the canon physical attributes of Shiva and Vishnu side by side equally, in the depiction of Harihara in Java, those attributes are mixed and not always follows a rigid pattern. It is suggested that the depiction of  kings as Harihara show an attempt to project them as the unifier of different factions and religious sects. The inequal depiction of Vishnu and Siva’s attributes in king’s deification statues indicates not only the dynamics of the religion in the era, but also as mean to build king’s image in the image of the God.","PeriodicalId":33299,"journal":{"name":"Gelar Jurnal Seni Budaya","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gelar Jurnal Seni Budaya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33153/glr.v19i1.3533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Harihara is the amalgamation of two great gods in Hinduism, Siva and Vishnu. During the Late Classical Era (Majapahit period, 13th-15th centuries AD) three deification statues which portrayed the kings as Harihara have been found. Out of these three, two of them are not located in Indonesia anymore, one is part of the collection of Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg, and one is in Christie’s Auction Gallery. Since these two statues are not widely known, they are barely mentioned or studied in the field of classical archaeology and art. This research focuses on the physical attributes of those two statues, particularly the clothing elements and divine attributes, in comparation to the deification statue of Raden Wijaya as Harihara, which is originated from Candi Simping and now is located in National Museum, Jakarta. The research was conducted using a qualitative-comparative method with iconographic and historical approach. It is found that while these statues show the amalgamation of Siva and Vishnu’s attributes, the depiction of Harihara in those statues are not exactly following Harihara iconography as regulated in the canons of Silpasastra and Manasara. While the canon physical attributes of Shiva and Vishnu side by side equally, in the depiction of Harihara in Java, those attributes are mixed and not always follows a rigid pattern. It is suggested that the depiction of  kings as Harihara show an attempt to project them as the unifier of different factions and religious sects. The inequal depiction of Vishnu and Siva’s attributes in king’s deification statues indicates not only the dynamics of the religion in the era, but also as mean to build king’s image in the image of the God.
比较Busana Arca Harihara时代经典结束(国立埃尔米塔什博物馆收藏、雅加达国家博物馆和佳士得Balai Lelang)
哈里哈拉是印度教两大神湿婆神和毗湿奴神的融合。在古典时代晚期(公元13-15世纪,马贾帕希特时期),人们发现了三尊将国王描绘成哈里哈拉的神化雕像。在这三件藏品中,有两件已不在印度尼西亚,一件是圣彼得堡埃尔米塔什博物馆的藏品,一件在佳士得拍卖行。由于这两尊雕像并不广为人知,在古典考古和艺术领域几乎没有人提及或研究过。本研究侧重于这两尊雕塑的物理属性,特别是服装元素和神圣属性,与拉登·维贾亚饰演哈里哈拉的神化雕像相比较,它起源于坎迪·辛平,现藏于雅加达国家博物馆。本研究采用图像学和历史学相结合的定性比较方法。研究发现,虽然这些雕像显示了湿婆和毗湿奴属性的融合,但这些雕像中对哈里哈拉的描绘并没有完全遵循Silpasastra和Manasara经典中规定的哈里哈拉肖像。虽然湿婆和毗湿奴的正典物理属性并列,但在爪哇对哈里哈拉的描绘中,这些属性是混合的,并不总是遵循严格的模式。有人认为,将国王描绘成哈里哈拉是为了将他们塑造成不同派别和宗教派别的统一者。国王神化雕像中对毗湿奴和湿婆属性的不平等描绘,不仅表明了宗教在这个时代的动态,而且意味着要以上帝的形象塑造国王的形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信