Joint Strategic Needs Assessments in London, the LGBTQ+ population and the latter’s health, care and wellbeing needs

IF 0.8 Q4 GERONTOLOGY
Ben Thomas, M. Sladen
{"title":"Joint Strategic Needs Assessments in London, the LGBTQ+ population and the latter’s health, care and wellbeing needs","authors":"Ben Thomas, M. Sladen","doi":"10.1108/qaoa-02-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nJoint Strategic Needs Assessments (JSNAs) are intended to help create evidence-based priorities for public health commissioning at local government level in the UK. They are supposed to consider the needs of people with protected characteristics, and this study aims to look at how the JSNAs for London are serving the city’s lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) population.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nJSNAs are documentary data and are in the public domain. Each of the 31 JSNAs for London was individually assessed against a series of questions designed to test their inclusion of the local LGBTQ+ population.\n\n\nFindings\nFewer than one in five of London’s JSNAs: had a dedicated LGBTQ+ section; cited bespoke research into, or engagement with, the local LGBTQ+ population; made recommendations for specialist services for people from this community; or considered intersectionality in the context of this population.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study demonstrates that many of London’s JSNAs contain little information on the city’s local LGBTQ+ population and only minimal assessment of its health, care and wellbeing needs. Recommendations include conducting further research on this population at the local level, using available guidance and engaging best practice.\n","PeriodicalId":44916,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-02-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Joint Strategic Needs Assessments (JSNAs) are intended to help create evidence-based priorities for public health commissioning at local government level in the UK. They are supposed to consider the needs of people with protected characteristics, and this study aims to look at how the JSNAs for London are serving the city’s lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) population. Design/methodology/approach JSNAs are documentary data and are in the public domain. Each of the 31 JSNAs for London was individually assessed against a series of questions designed to test their inclusion of the local LGBTQ+ population. Findings Fewer than one in five of London’s JSNAs: had a dedicated LGBTQ+ section; cited bespoke research into, or engagement with, the local LGBTQ+ population; made recommendations for specialist services for people from this community; or considered intersectionality in the context of this population. Originality/value This study demonstrates that many of London’s JSNAs contain little information on the city’s local LGBTQ+ population and only minimal assessment of its health, care and wellbeing needs. Recommendations include conducting further research on this population at the local level, using available guidance and engaging best practice.
伦敦联合战略需求评估、LGBTQ+人群以及后者的健康、护理和福祉需求
目的联合战略需求评估(JSNA)旨在帮助为英国地方政府层面的公共卫生委托制定基于证据的优先事项。它们应该考虑具有受保护特征的人的需求,本研究旨在观察伦敦的联合战略需求评估如何为该市的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、,跨性别和酷儿(LGBTQ+)群体。设计/方法/方法JSNA是文献数据,属于公共领域。伦敦的31个JSNA中的每一个都针对一系列问题进行了单独评估,这些问题旨在测试他们是否包括当地LGBTQ+人群。发现在伦敦的JSNA中,不到五分之一的人:有专门的LGBTQ+专区;引用了对当地LGBTQ+人群的定制研究或参与;为该社区的人提供专业服务的建议;或者在这一人群的背景下被认为是交叉性的。原创性/价值这项研究表明,伦敦的许多JSNA几乎没有关于该市当地LGBTQ+人群的信息,对其健康、护理和福祉需求的评估也很少。建议包括在地方一级对这一人群进行进一步研究,利用现有的指导意见并采用最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信