Embrittling Components in Sintered Steels: Comparison of Phosphorus and Boron

Q4 Materials Science
H. Danninger, V. Vassileva, C. Gierl-Mayer
{"title":"Embrittling Components in Sintered Steels: Comparison of Phosphorus and Boron","authors":"H. Danninger, V. Vassileva, C. Gierl-Mayer","doi":"10.1515/pmp-2017-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In ferrous powder metallurgy, both boron and phosphorus have been known to be sintering activators for a long time. However, the use has been widely different: while P is a standard additive to sintered iron and steels, boron has been frequently studied, but its use in practice is very limited. Both additives are also known to be potentially embrittling, though in a different way. In the present study the differences between the effects of both elements are shown: while P activates sintering up to a certain threshold, in part by stabilizing ferrite, in part by forming a transient liquid phase, boron is the classical additive enhancing persistent liquid phase, being virtually insoluble in the iron matrix. The consequence is that sintered steels can tolerate quite a proportion of phosphorus, depending on composition and sintering process; boron however is strongly embrittling in particular in combination with carbon, which requires establishing a precisely defined content that enhances sintering but is not yet embrittling. The fracture mode of embrittled materials is also different: while with Fe-P the classical intergranular fracture is observed, with boron a much more rugged fracture surface appears, indicating some failure through the eutectic interparticle network but mostly transgranular cleavage. If carbon is added, in both cases transgranular cleavage dominates even in the severely embrittled specimens, indicating that no more the grain boundaries and sintering necks are the weakest links in the systems.","PeriodicalId":52175,"journal":{"name":"Powder Metallurgy Progress","volume":"17 1","pages":"47 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Powder Metallurgy Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pmp-2017-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract In ferrous powder metallurgy, both boron and phosphorus have been known to be sintering activators for a long time. However, the use has been widely different: while P is a standard additive to sintered iron and steels, boron has been frequently studied, but its use in practice is very limited. Both additives are also known to be potentially embrittling, though in a different way. In the present study the differences between the effects of both elements are shown: while P activates sintering up to a certain threshold, in part by stabilizing ferrite, in part by forming a transient liquid phase, boron is the classical additive enhancing persistent liquid phase, being virtually insoluble in the iron matrix. The consequence is that sintered steels can tolerate quite a proportion of phosphorus, depending on composition and sintering process; boron however is strongly embrittling in particular in combination with carbon, which requires establishing a precisely defined content that enhances sintering but is not yet embrittling. The fracture mode of embrittled materials is also different: while with Fe-P the classical intergranular fracture is observed, with boron a much more rugged fracture surface appears, indicating some failure through the eutectic interparticle network but mostly transgranular cleavage. If carbon is added, in both cases transgranular cleavage dominates even in the severely embrittled specimens, indicating that no more the grain boundaries and sintering necks are the weakest links in the systems.
烧结钢的脆化成分:磷和硼的比较
在铁粉末冶金中,硼和磷长期以来都被认为是烧结助剂。然而,用途却大不相同:虽然P是烧结铁和钢的标准添加剂,但硼经常被研究,但它在实践中的应用非常有限。众所周知,这两种添加剂都有潜在的脆化作用,尽管方式不同。在目前的研究中,两种元素的作用之间的差异显示:虽然P激活烧结达到一定的阈值,部分是通过稳定铁氧体,部分是通过形成瞬态液相,硼是经典的添加剂,增强持久液相,几乎不溶于铁基体。结果是烧结钢可以承受相当比例的磷,这取决于成分和烧结工艺;然而,硼是强脆的,特别是与碳结合时,这需要建立一个精确定义的含量,以增强烧结,但还没有脆化。脆性材料的断裂模式也不同:Fe-P的断裂是典型的晶间断裂,而硼的断口则更为崎岖,表明一些破坏是通过共晶晶间网络进行的,但主要是穿晶解理。如果添加碳,在这两种情况下,即使在严重脆化的试样中,穿晶解理也占主导地位,这表明晶界和烧结颈不再是体系中最薄弱的环节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Powder Metallurgy Progress
Powder Metallurgy Progress Materials Science-Metals and Alloys
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信