Discourse, Antagonisms, and Identities during the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
A. Anisin
{"title":"Discourse, Antagonisms, and Identities during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"A. Anisin","doi":"10.4000/rccs.13434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study utilizes theory from the Essex School of Ideology and Discourse Analysis (IDA) and investigates speeches and statements made by high-ranking European Union officials from the European Commission as well as policy documents. The inquiry reveals that antagonistic language was used to justify the tracking and tracing of civilians through the articulation of an empty “track and trace” signifier and the articulation of new identities premised on the vaccinated and non-vaccinated. Policy makers articulated new ideas surrounding a regime of truth and a common “people” while simultaneously negating opponents to pandemic policies by articulating floating signifiers, including xenophobia, disinformation, and populism. The exercise of power in health policies during the pandemic functioned according to logics similar to those employed in traditional political domains. © 2022 Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":54161,"journal":{"name":"Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.13434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study utilizes theory from the Essex School of Ideology and Discourse Analysis (IDA) and investigates speeches and statements made by high-ranking European Union officials from the European Commission as well as policy documents. The inquiry reveals that antagonistic language was used to justify the tracking and tracing of civilians through the articulation of an empty “track and trace” signifier and the articulation of new identities premised on the vaccinated and non-vaccinated. Policy makers articulated new ideas surrounding a regime of truth and a common “people” while simultaneously negating opponents to pandemic policies by articulating floating signifiers, including xenophobia, disinformation, and populism. The exercise of power in health policies during the pandemic functioned according to logics similar to those employed in traditional political domains. © 2022 Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra. All rights reserved.
COVID-19大流行期间的话语、对抗和身份认同
本研究运用了埃塞克斯意识形态与话语分析学院(IDA)的理论,并调查了欧盟委员会高级欧盟官员的演讲和声明以及政策文件。调查显示,敌对的语言被用来为跟踪和追踪平民辩护,通过表达空洞的“跟踪和追踪”能指,并以接种疫苗和未接种疫苗者为前提,表达新的身份。政策制定者阐述了围绕真理政权和共同“人民”的新思想,同时通过阐明仇外心理、虚假信息和民粹主义等浮动符号,否定了流行病政策的反对者。大流行期间卫生政策权力的行使按照与传统政治领域类似的逻辑运作。©2022科英布拉大学社会研究中心。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais
Revista Critica de Ciencias Sociais SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信