Impact of the Duration of Larval Yolk Sac Absorption on the Development of Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum 1792) Fry

Q3 Environmental Science
Antonia Kurtela
{"title":"Impact of the Duration of Larval Yolk Sac Absorption on the Development of Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum 1792) Fry","authors":"Antonia Kurtela","doi":"10.2478/cjf-2021-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum 1792) larvae that first started active feeding were separated into 3 replicate batches (1A, 1B, 1C) with 100 individuals each, while four days later, the fry that last started active feeding were also distributed in 3 replicate batches (2A, 2B, 2C) with 100 individuals. Four measurements were performed with an interval of four days between the first and second measurements, as well as between the third and fourth measurements, to compare the initial masses of individuals by groups (1ABC and 2ABC) on the same day from the beginning of active feeding. The average initial body weight of the fry per batch in each measurement was generally higher in the first group (1ABC) than in the second group (2ABC). However, when comparing the weight of both groups for the same number of days from the beginning of active feeding, it is noticed that the second group (2ABC) has a higher average individual weight than the first group (1ABC). There was no statistically significant difference (one-way ANOVA, p>0.05) in SGRw between the groups in the first three measurements, while there is a statistically significant difference (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05) in SGRw in the fourth measurement. Group 2ABC has a significantly higher SGRw (5.0064%day−1±0.05394) than group 1ABC (4.7711%day−1±0.01715). This leads to the conclusion that in the second group 2ABC, the backlog of 4 days in mass was compensated. It is also noted that mortality in the first group (1ABC) was only 1%, while in the second group (2ABC) it was 3.7%. Consequently, a higher density of the fry in the first group (1ABC) could have an impact on a lower growth rate.","PeriodicalId":38161,"journal":{"name":"Ribarstvo, Croatian Journal of Fisheries","volume":"79 1","pages":"119 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ribarstvo, Croatian Journal of Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cjf-2021-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum 1792) larvae that first started active feeding were separated into 3 replicate batches (1A, 1B, 1C) with 100 individuals each, while four days later, the fry that last started active feeding were also distributed in 3 replicate batches (2A, 2B, 2C) with 100 individuals. Four measurements were performed with an interval of four days between the first and second measurements, as well as between the third and fourth measurements, to compare the initial masses of individuals by groups (1ABC and 2ABC) on the same day from the beginning of active feeding. The average initial body weight of the fry per batch in each measurement was generally higher in the first group (1ABC) than in the second group (2ABC). However, when comparing the weight of both groups for the same number of days from the beginning of active feeding, it is noticed that the second group (2ABC) has a higher average individual weight than the first group (1ABC). There was no statistically significant difference (one-way ANOVA, p>0.05) in SGRw between the groups in the first three measurements, while there is a statistically significant difference (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05) in SGRw in the fourth measurement. Group 2ABC has a significantly higher SGRw (5.0064%day−1±0.05394) than group 1ABC (4.7711%day−1±0.01715). This leads to the conclusion that in the second group 2ABC, the backlog of 4 days in mass was compensated. It is also noted that mortality in the first group (1ABC) was only 1%, while in the second group (2ABC) it was 3.7%. Consequently, a higher density of the fry in the first group (1ABC) could have an impact on a lower growth rate.
幼虫卵黄囊吸收时间对虹鳟鱼苗发育的影响
将最先开始主动摄食的虹鳟(Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum 1792)幼虫分成3个重复批次(1A、1B、1C),每批次100尾,4 d后将最后开始主动摄食的鱼苗也分成3个重复批次(2A、2B、2C),每批次100尾。在第一次和第二次测量之间以及第三次和第四次测量之间间隔四天进行了四次测量,比较各组(1ABC和2ABC)在主动进食开始当天的个体初始质量。每次测量中,第一组(1ABC)每批鱼苗的平均初始体重普遍高于第二组(2ABC)。然而,当比较两组在开始主动喂养后相同天数内的体重时,我们注意到第二组(2ABC)的平均个体体重高于第一组(1ABC)。前3次测量组间SGRw差异无统计学意义(单因素方差分析,p<0.05),第4次测量组间SGRw差异有统计学意义(单因素方差分析,p<0.05)。2ABC组SGRw (5.0064%day−1±0.05394)显著高于1ABC组(4.7711%day−1±0.01715)。由此得出结论,在第二组2ABC中,大量积压的4天得到了补偿。还注意到,第一组(1ABC)的死亡率仅为1%,而第二组(2ABC)的死亡率为3.7%。因此,第一组(1ABC)中较高的鱼苗密度可能对较低的生长率产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ribarstvo, Croatian Journal of Fisheries
Ribarstvo, Croatian Journal of Fisheries Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Croatian Journal of Fisheries was established in 1938 and today possesses a long-term tradition of publishing papers that deal with both freshwater and marine fisheries. Areas covered by the Journal include ichthyology, aquaculture, ecology and diseases of fish and other aquatic organisms, problems of open waters and other topics related to the fisheries field. Prior to publication, articles pass through rigorous review by senior scientists from around the world. The Journal features articles that reflect original research, interpretative content and subject matter of interest to the fisheries profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信