Social Investment in an Age of Austerity: A Comparison of Family Policy Reforms in Four European Countries
IF 0.3
4区 社会学
Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES
S. Blum, S. Correia, Mikael Nygård, Tatjana Rakar, K. Wall
{"title":"Social Investment in an Age of Austerity: A Comparison of Family Policy Reforms in Four European Countries","authors":"S. Blum, S. Correia, Mikael Nygård, Tatjana Rakar, K. Wall","doi":"10.3935/RSP.V27I3.1563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this article is on family policy reforms in four European countries – Austria, Finland, Portugal, and Slovenia – between 2008 and 2015 These years were marked by the ‘Great Recession’, and by the rise of the so-cial-investment perspective Social investment is an umbrella concept, though, and it is also somewhat ambiguous This article distinguishes between different social-investment variants, which emerge from a focus on its interaction with alternative social-policy perspectives, namely social protection and austeri-ty We identify different variants along the degree of social-investment: from comprehensive, over crowding out, towards lean forms While the empirical analysis highlights variation, it also shows how there is a specific crisis context, which may lead to ‘crowding out’ of other policy approaches and ‘leaner’ forms of social investment This has led to strong cutbacks in family cash benefits, while public childcare and parental leaves have proved more resilient in the investigated countries Those findings are revelatory in the current Covid-19 pandemic, where countries are entering a next, possibly larger economic crisis © 2020, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Political Sciences All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":53979,"journal":{"name":"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku","volume":"27 1","pages":"249-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/RSP.V27I3.1563","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The focus of this article is on family policy reforms in four European countries – Austria, Finland, Portugal, and Slovenia – between 2008 and 2015 These years were marked by the ‘Great Recession’, and by the rise of the so-cial-investment perspective Social investment is an umbrella concept, though, and it is also somewhat ambiguous This article distinguishes between different social-investment variants, which emerge from a focus on its interaction with alternative social-policy perspectives, namely social protection and austeri-ty We identify different variants along the degree of social-investment: from comprehensive, over crowding out, towards lean forms While the empirical analysis highlights variation, it also shows how there is a specific crisis context, which may lead to ‘crowding out’ of other policy approaches and ‘leaner’ forms of social investment This has led to strong cutbacks in family cash benefits, while public childcare and parental leaves have proved more resilient in the investigated countries Those findings are revelatory in the current Covid-19 pandemic, where countries are entering a next, possibly larger economic crisis © 2020, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Political Sciences All rights reserved
紧缩时代的社会投资:欧洲四国家庭政策改革比较
本文的重点是2008年至2015年间四个欧洲国家——奥地利、芬兰、葡萄牙和斯洛文尼亚——的家庭政策改革。这些年以“大衰退”和社会投资视角的兴起为标志,这篇文章区分了不同的社会投资变体,这些变体源于其与替代社会政策视角的互动,即社会保护和紧缩。我们根据社会投资的程度确定了不同的变体:从全面、过度挤出、,倾向于精简形式虽然实证分析强调了差异,但它也表明了具体的危机背景是如何存在的,这可能会导致其他政策方法和“精简”形式的社会投资被“挤出”。这导致了家庭现金福利的大幅削减,尽管事实证明,在被调查的国家,公共托儿服务和育儿假更具弹性。这些发现对当前的新冠肺炎疫情具有启示意义,各国正在进入下一场可能更大的经济危机©2020,萨格勒布大学政治科学学院保留所有权利
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。