The effect of basic cycle length stimuli on effective refractory period measurement

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mohammd Sadr-Ameli, Farzad Kamali, Milad Vahedinezhad, Sadaf Sadrameli
{"title":"The effect of basic cycle length stimuli on effective refractory period measurement","authors":"Mohammd Sadr-Ameli, Farzad Kamali, Milad Vahedinezhad, Sadaf Sadrameli","doi":"10.4103/rcm.rcm_1_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Refractory periods are measured by the extrastimulus technique, whereby a single extrastimulus is introduced at progressively shorter coupling intervals until a response is no longer elicited. Purpose: As refractoriness of cardiac tissues depends on prior cycle length, refractory periods should be determined at a fixed cycle length within the physiologic range. The extrastimulus is delivered after a train of 8 to 10 paced complexes to allow time for reasonable stabilization of refractoriness, which is usually accomplished after the first 3 or 4 paced beats. Objectives: We conducted this study to compare the effect of 6 vs 8 stimuli in basic cycle length (BCL) in measurement of effective refractory period (ERP). Materials and Methods: During electrophysiologic study (EPS) of 100 consecutive patients, anterograde and retrograde ERP of atrioventricular node (AVN) were measured by introduction of 6 vs 8 stimuli in BCL and premature beat, then the results were compared. Results: Recorded anterograde and retrograde ERP of AVN applying 6 vs 8 stimuli in BCL were compared and no difference was detected. Conclusion: We concluded that for ERP measurement of AVN, 6 stimuli in BCL is comparable to 8 stimuli in reaching the steady state.","PeriodicalId":21031,"journal":{"name":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"37 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/rcm.rcm_1_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Refractory periods are measured by the extrastimulus technique, whereby a single extrastimulus is introduced at progressively shorter coupling intervals until a response is no longer elicited. Purpose: As refractoriness of cardiac tissues depends on prior cycle length, refractory periods should be determined at a fixed cycle length within the physiologic range. The extrastimulus is delivered after a train of 8 to 10 paced complexes to allow time for reasonable stabilization of refractoriness, which is usually accomplished after the first 3 or 4 paced beats. Objectives: We conducted this study to compare the effect of 6 vs 8 stimuli in basic cycle length (BCL) in measurement of effective refractory period (ERP). Materials and Methods: During electrophysiologic study (EPS) of 100 consecutive patients, anterograde and retrograde ERP of atrioventricular node (AVN) were measured by introduction of 6 vs 8 stimuli in BCL and premature beat, then the results were compared. Results: Recorded anterograde and retrograde ERP of AVN applying 6 vs 8 stimuli in BCL were compared and no difference was detected. Conclusion: We concluded that for ERP measurement of AVN, 6 stimuli in BCL is comparable to 8 stimuli in reaching the steady state.
基本周期长度刺激对有效不应期测量的影响
背景:不应期是通过外刺激技术来测量的,即以逐渐缩短的耦合间隔引入单个外刺激,直到不再引发反应。目的:由于心脏组织的不应期取决于先前的周期长度,因此应在生理范围内以固定的周期长度确定不应期。额外刺激是在一系列8到10个节奏的复合物之后进行的,以留出时间合理稳定不应性,这通常在前3或4个节奏的节拍之后完成。目的:我们进行了这项研究,比较6和8种基本周期长度刺激(BCL)在测量有效不应期(ERP)方面的效果。材料与方法:在连续100例患者的电生理研究中,通过在BCL和早搏中引入6和8种刺激来测量房室结(AVN)的顺行和逆行ERP,并将结果进行比较。结果:对BCL中应用6和8种刺激记录的AVN顺行和逆行ERP进行比较,没有发现差异。结论:对于AVN的ERP测量,BCL中的6个刺激与8个刺激在达到稳态方面相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信