Bank capital, earnings smoothing and provisioning practices in Nigeria: IFRS and risk evidence

A. Salami, A. Uthman
{"title":"Bank capital, earnings smoothing and provisioning practices in Nigeria: IFRS and risk evidence","authors":"A. Salami, A. Uthman","doi":"10.1108/ajeb-05-2022-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study empirically tests the use of loan loss provisions (LLPs) for earnings and capital smoothing when emphasis is laid on banks' riskiness and adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) in Nigeria.Design/methodology/approachAnnual bank-level data are hand-extracted between 2007 and 2017 from annual reports of a sample 16 deposit money banks (DMBs), and analysed using appropriate panel regression models subsequent to a number of diagnostic tests including heteroscedasticity, autocorrelation and cross-sectional dependence. The use of both reported LLPs (TLLP) and discretionary LLPs (DLLP) for earnings and capital management is tested to advance the practice in the literature.FindingsGenerally, the study finds that Nigerian DMBs manage capital via LLPs, while mixed results are obtained for earnings smoothing. However, during IFRS, Nigerian DMBs' management of capital is identifiable with TLLP, while smoothing of earnings is peculiar to DLLP. Additionally, evidence of the improvement in loan loss reporting quality expected during IFRS for riskier Nigerian DMBs, could not be attained. This is corroborated by the study's findings of the use of both TLLP and DLLP for earnings and capital management during IFRS by DMBs in solvency crisis against the only use of TLLP to manage capital found for the entire period.Practical implicationsThe evidential capital and earnings lopsidedness may subject Nigerian DMBs' going-concern to a lot of questions.Originality/valueThe study sets a foremost record in the empirical test of managerial opportunistic behaviour embedded in earnings and capital concurrently while accounting for loan losses by all categories of Nigerian DMBs in terms of riskiness, following accounting regime change.","PeriodicalId":34606,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Economics and Banking","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Economics and Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajeb-05-2022-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study empirically tests the use of loan loss provisions (LLPs) for earnings and capital smoothing when emphasis is laid on banks' riskiness and adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) in Nigeria.Design/methodology/approachAnnual bank-level data are hand-extracted between 2007 and 2017 from annual reports of a sample 16 deposit money banks (DMBs), and analysed using appropriate panel regression models subsequent to a number of diagnostic tests including heteroscedasticity, autocorrelation and cross-sectional dependence. The use of both reported LLPs (TLLP) and discretionary LLPs (DLLP) for earnings and capital management is tested to advance the practice in the literature.FindingsGenerally, the study finds that Nigerian DMBs manage capital via LLPs, while mixed results are obtained for earnings smoothing. However, during IFRS, Nigerian DMBs' management of capital is identifiable with TLLP, while smoothing of earnings is peculiar to DLLP. Additionally, evidence of the improvement in loan loss reporting quality expected during IFRS for riskier Nigerian DMBs, could not be attained. This is corroborated by the study's findings of the use of both TLLP and DLLP for earnings and capital management during IFRS by DMBs in solvency crisis against the only use of TLLP to manage capital found for the entire period.Practical implicationsThe evidential capital and earnings lopsidedness may subject Nigerian DMBs' going-concern to a lot of questions.Originality/valueThe study sets a foremost record in the empirical test of managerial opportunistic behaviour embedded in earnings and capital concurrently while accounting for loan losses by all categories of Nigerian DMBs in terms of riskiness, following accounting regime change.
尼日利亚的银行资本、盈利平滑和拨备做法:国际财务报告准则和风险证据
目的本研究实证检验了在尼日利亚,当强调银行的风险性和采用国际财务报告准则(IFRS)时,贷款损失准备金(LLP)用于盈利和资本平滑的使用。设计/方法/方法从样本16家存款银行(DMB)的年度报告中手工提取2007年至2017年的年度银行级数据,并在包括异方差、自相关和截面依赖性在内的许多诊断测试之后使用适当的面板回归模型进行分析。为了推进文献中的实践,对报告有限责任合伙(TLLP)和全权委托有限责任合伙在盈余和资本管理中的使用进行了测试。研究结果总体而言,研究发现尼日利亚DMB通过LLP管理资本,而收益平滑的结果喜忧参半。然而,在《国际财务报告准则》中,尼日利亚DMB的资本管理可通过TLLP进行识别,而收益平滑则是DLLP特有的。此外,未能获得《国际财务报告准则》中预期风险较高的尼日利亚DMB的贷款损失报告质量有所改善的证据。该研究结果证实了这一点,即DMB在偿付能力危机中使用TLLP和DLLP进行IFRS期间的盈利和资本管理,而不是仅使用TLLP管理整个期间的资本。实际含义证据资本和收益的不平衡可能会使尼日利亚DMB的持续经营面临很多问题。独创性/价值该研究在收益和资本中同时嵌入的管理机会主义行为的实证测试中创下了最重要的记录,同时在会计制度变化后,从风险角度考虑尼日利亚各类DMB的贷款损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信