Audit expectation gap: a comprehensive literature review

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
A. G. Deepal, A. Jayamaha
{"title":"Audit expectation gap: a comprehensive literature review","authors":"A. G. Deepal, A. Jayamaha","doi":"10.1108/ajar-10-2021-0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper reviews a substantial body of scholarly work on the audit expectation gap (AEG) for many years and aims to construct a new synthesis of the existing knowledge of the AEG discovered by numerous scholars in the world.Design/methodology/approachA broad search of the literature was conducted using a few AEG related keywords in the Google Scholar search engine and two databases of Scopus and Emerald from 1974 to 2021. Only the articles published in reputable journals concerning the AEG were selected after applying some selection criteria.FindingsThe concept of AEG is a multidimensional concept. Different causes for the AEG were identified, and several strategies were summarized into major promising strategies for narrowing it. It was found that the AEG cannot be eradicated entirely from society.Practical implicationsThis review of the literature will be of interest to auditors, financial statement users, regulatory agencies, and policymakers, among other parties. Further, this AEG synthesis may be useful in understanding misperceptions and determining how they differ across diverse stakeholders.Originality/valueThere is a dearth of literature review studies incorporating all the facets of AEG. Hence, this study incorporates all those facets, namely research methods and instruments and dimensions used along with causes and mechanisms to narrow down the AEG while addressing the gaps and highlighting the themes for future research. Finally, a fresh, yet more straightforward definition was generated as a result of the comprehensive review of the literature, adding novelty to the extant literature.","PeriodicalId":33161,"journal":{"name":"AJAR Asian Journal of Accounting Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJAR Asian Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-10-2021-0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

PurposeThis paper reviews a substantial body of scholarly work on the audit expectation gap (AEG) for many years and aims to construct a new synthesis of the existing knowledge of the AEG discovered by numerous scholars in the world.Design/methodology/approachA broad search of the literature was conducted using a few AEG related keywords in the Google Scholar search engine and two databases of Scopus and Emerald from 1974 to 2021. Only the articles published in reputable journals concerning the AEG were selected after applying some selection criteria.FindingsThe concept of AEG is a multidimensional concept. Different causes for the AEG were identified, and several strategies were summarized into major promising strategies for narrowing it. It was found that the AEG cannot be eradicated entirely from society.Practical implicationsThis review of the literature will be of interest to auditors, financial statement users, regulatory agencies, and policymakers, among other parties. Further, this AEG synthesis may be useful in understanding misperceptions and determining how they differ across diverse stakeholders.Originality/valueThere is a dearth of literature review studies incorporating all the facets of AEG. Hence, this study incorporates all those facets, namely research methods and instruments and dimensions used along with causes and mechanisms to narrow down the AEG while addressing the gaps and highlighting the themes for future research. Finally, a fresh, yet more straightforward definition was generated as a result of the comprehensive review of the literature, adding novelty to the extant literature.
审计期望差距:文献综述
本文回顾了多年来有关审计期望差距(AEG)的大量学术研究成果,旨在对国际上众多学者发现的AEG现有知识构建一个新的综合。设计/方法学/方法利用b谷歌Scholar搜索引擎和Scopus和Emerald两个数据库中与AEG相关的几个关键词,对1974 - 2021年的文献进行了广泛检索。只有发表在知名期刊上的与AEG相关的文章才会在应用一些选择标准后被选中。AEG的概念是一个多维的概念。分析了造成AEG的不同原因,总结了几种策略,为缩小AEG的主要有希望的策略。人们发现,不可能从社会中完全根除AEG。实际意义这篇文献综述将对审计师、财务报表使用者、监管机构和政策制定者以及其他各方感兴趣。此外,这种AEG综合可能有助于理解误解,并确定它们在不同利益相关者之间的差异。原创性/价值缺乏文献综述研究纳入AEG的所有方面。因此,本研究结合了所有这些方面,即研究方法、工具和使用的维度以及原因和机制,以缩小AEG的范围,同时解决差距并突出未来研究的主题。最后,通过对文献的全面回顾,产生了一个新的、更直接的定义,为现有文献增添了新颖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJAR Asian Journal of Accounting Research
AJAR Asian Journal of Accounting Research Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信