The concurrent and predictive validity of a tool to measure strength engagement during inclusive equestrian vaulting

Q3 Social Sciences
Virginia Lefeaux, L. Stuart-Hill, Helgi Sangret, Daniel T. Vipond, Amber Nordquist, R. Busch, V. Temple
{"title":"The concurrent and predictive validity of a tool to measure strength engagement during inclusive equestrian vaulting","authors":"Virginia Lefeaux, L. Stuart-Hill, Helgi Sangret, Daniel T. Vipond, Amber Nordquist, R. Busch, V. Temple","doi":"10.5507/euj.2021.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Participation in muscle strengthening activities is a less examined component of public health physical activity guidelines for children and youth compared to participation in physical activity. In part, the lack of focus on strength is associated with the difficultly of measuring strength activities during participation. The aim of this pilot study was to develop and provide evidence of the concurrent and predictive validity of the Strength Observation during Vaulting (SOV) tool. Six female youth (4 with a disability and 2 without a disability) ranging in age from 11 – 22 years (M age = 14.2 y, SD = 4.0) participating in a 5-day inclusive equestrian vaulting camp were recruited. Participants completed three measures of strength, and video of vaulters engaging in camp activities was coded using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT) and SOV tools. From a linear regression model (significant p = .020), the three measures of strength accounted for 98.7% of the shared variance with time spent in SOV levels 4 and 5. Bivariate correlation coefficients comparing SOV levels 4 and 5 and moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) from SOFIT were r = .73 for all contexts, r = .89 for floor-work, r = .64 for barrel vaulting, r = .76 for horse vaulting, and r = .81 for stable chores. The predictive and concurrent validity of the SOV tool was more than adequate. Based on these results, the systematic observation is a feasible approach to assess engagement in strength activities during vaulting. completed both cued","PeriodicalId":37918,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/euj.2021.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Participation in muscle strengthening activities is a less examined component of public health physical activity guidelines for children and youth compared to participation in physical activity. In part, the lack of focus on strength is associated with the difficultly of measuring strength activities during participation. The aim of this pilot study was to develop and provide evidence of the concurrent and predictive validity of the Strength Observation during Vaulting (SOV) tool. Six female youth (4 with a disability and 2 without a disability) ranging in age from 11 – 22 years (M age = 14.2 y, SD = 4.0) participating in a 5-day inclusive equestrian vaulting camp were recruited. Participants completed three measures of strength, and video of vaulters engaging in camp activities was coded using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT) and SOV tools. From a linear regression model (significant p = .020), the three measures of strength accounted for 98.7% of the shared variance with time spent in SOV levels 4 and 5. Bivariate correlation coefficients comparing SOV levels 4 and 5 and moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) from SOFIT were r = .73 for all contexts, r = .89 for floor-work, r = .64 for barrel vaulting, r = .76 for horse vaulting, and r = .81 for stable chores. The predictive and concurrent validity of the SOV tool was more than adequate. Based on these results, the systematic observation is a feasible approach to assess engagement in strength activities during vaulting. completed both cued
测量包容性马术跳马力量投入的工具的同时有效性和预测有效性
与参加体育活动相比,参加肌肉强化活动是儿童和青少年公共卫生体育活动指南中较少审查的组成部分。在某种程度上,缺乏对力量的关注与参与过程中测量力量活动的困难有关。这项初步研究的目的是开发并提供证据,证明在跳跃过程中强度观察(SOV)工具的并发性和预测性有效性。招募了6名年龄在11 - 22岁(M年龄= 14.2 y, SD = 4.0)的女性青年(4名残疾和2名非残疾)参加为期5天的马术跳马训练营。参与者完成了三项力量测量,并使用观察健身指导时间系统(SOFIT)和SOV工具对跳马运动员参加营地活动的视频进行编码。从线性回归模型(显著性p = 0.020)来看,三个强度测量值占SOV水平4和5所花费时间的共有方差的98.7%。SOV水平4和5与SOFIT中中等强度体力活动(MVPA)的双变量相关系数在所有情境下均为r = 0.73,在地板工作中为r = 0.89,在桶跳中为r = 0.64,在马跳中为r = 0.76,在马厩杂务中为r = 0.81。SOV工具的预测和并发有效性是绰绰有余的。基于这些结果,系统的观察是评估跳跃过程中力量活动参与程度的可行方法。完成两个线索
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity (EUJAPA) is an international, multidisciplinary journal, introduced to communicate, share and stimulate academic inquiry focusing on physical activity of persons with special needs. Articles appearing in EUJAPA reflect cross disciplinary nature of the academic discipline of adapted physical activity ranging from physical education, through sport, recreation, rehabilitation, dance, sport medicine or health care. EUJAPA is the official journal of the European Federation of Adapted Physical Activity. This multidisciplinary journal provides the latest academic inquiry related to physical activity for special populations. Regular features include qualitative and quantitative research studies, case studies, review articles, viewpoints, methodological guidelines, and editorial commentary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信