Análise de processo da tarefa de levantar-se do solo em idosos saudáveis

Q4 Medicine
Frederico Santos de Santana, Camila de Santana Mota, L. C. Pereira, Maria Teresa Cattuzzo, Marisete Peralta Safons
{"title":"Análise de processo da tarefa de levantar-se do solo em idosos saudáveis","authors":"Frederico Santos de Santana, Camila de Santana Mota, L. C. Pereira, Maria Teresa Cattuzzo, Marisete Peralta Safons","doi":"10.6063/MOTRICIDADE.19628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supine-To-Stand task is considered a developmental milestone, useful, valid, and reliable means of tracking functional motor competence. Concerning the elderly, the diversity of protocols used for Supine-To-Stand analysis requires rigorous examination. This study aimed to determine the protocol with the greatest methodological advantage for analyzing the Supine-To-Stand task process of older adults, both sexes and aged ≥ 60 years. A systematic review was carried out on the process analysis protocols of the Supine-To-Stand task. The application of criteria (clarity of language, exemption from floor and ceiling effect, reproducibility and satisfactory reliability, detail of the task, coding time) and the attribution of scores that added together allowed to classify the protocols according to the level of methodological advantage: greater (Σ≥ 10), median (Σ between 6–9) or less (Σ≤ 5), allowed the selection of the protocol with the greatest methodological advantage. The results showed that all protocols were considered to be at least of medium advantage. The protocol proposed by Manini et al. presented greater methodological advantage (Σ= 10), allowing us to conclude that this protocol is the most suitable for analyzing the Supine-To-Stand process in the elderly, especially for presenting excellent performance in language clarity, low coding time, being free of floor or ceiling effect, being reproducible and reliable.\nKeywords: activities of daily living; motor skills; geriatric assessment; frail elderly; aged","PeriodicalId":53589,"journal":{"name":"Motricidade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motricidade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6063/MOTRICIDADE.19628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supine-To-Stand task is considered a developmental milestone, useful, valid, and reliable means of tracking functional motor competence. Concerning the elderly, the diversity of protocols used for Supine-To-Stand analysis requires rigorous examination. This study aimed to determine the protocol with the greatest methodological advantage for analyzing the Supine-To-Stand task process of older adults, both sexes and aged ≥ 60 years. A systematic review was carried out on the process analysis protocols of the Supine-To-Stand task. The application of criteria (clarity of language, exemption from floor and ceiling effect, reproducibility and satisfactory reliability, detail of the task, coding time) and the attribution of scores that added together allowed to classify the protocols according to the level of methodological advantage: greater (Σ≥ 10), median (Σ between 6–9) or less (Σ≤ 5), allowed the selection of the protocol with the greatest methodological advantage. The results showed that all protocols were considered to be at least of medium advantage. The protocol proposed by Manini et al. presented greater methodological advantage (Σ= 10), allowing us to conclude that this protocol is the most suitable for analyzing the Supine-To-Stand process in the elderly, especially for presenting excellent performance in language clarity, low coding time, being free of floor or ceiling effect, being reproducible and reliable. Keywords: activities of daily living; motor skills; geriatric assessment; frail elderly; aged
健康老年人从地面站立任务的过程分析
仰卧站立任务被认为是一个发展的里程碑,是追踪功能性运动能力的有用、有效和可靠的手段。对于老年人,仰卧站立分析所采用的方案的多样性需要严格的审查。本研究旨在确定具有最大方法学优势的方案,用于分析年龄≥60岁的男女老年人仰卧-站立任务过程。对仰卧站立任务的过程分析方案进行了系统的综述。标准的应用(语言的清晰性,免于下限和上限效应,可重复性和令人满意的可靠性,任务的细节,编码时间)和分数的归因加在一起,允许根据方法学优势水平对方案进行分类:较大(Σ≥10),中位数(Σ介于6-9之间)或较小(Σ≤5),允许选择具有最大方法学优势的方案。结果表明,所有方案被认为至少具有中等优势。Manini等人提出的方案具有更大的方法学优势(Σ= 10),我们可以得出结论,该方案最适合分析老年人仰卧转立过程,特别是在语言清晰、编码时间短、无地板或天花板效应、可重复性好、可靠等方面表现出色。关键词:日常生活活动;运动技能;老年的评估;虚弱的老人;岁的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Motricidade
Motricidade Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信