Implementing Design Thinking and Peer Instruction in an Online Environment to Develop Tourism Undergraduates’ English Language Skills

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Zuzana Sándorová, Norbert Beták
{"title":"Implementing Design Thinking and Peer Instruction in an Online Environment to Develop Tourism Undergraduates’ English Language Skills","authors":"Zuzana Sándorová, Norbert Beták","doi":"10.2478/jolace-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Design thinking (DT) and Peer Instruction (PI) are two different and seemingly distant methods. However, both rely on students’ active participation, cooperation and communication with each other. Due to these features, therefore, they have the potential to foster foreign language competences successfully. Nevertheless, what if they were employed in a purely online learning environment? Could they still bring the praised learning outcomes, such as better conceptual understanding, more effective problem-solving, communication and teamwork skills, and increased student engagement and creativity? The present study aims to answer the given question by giving insight into implementing the methods in English for Specific Purposes courses at Constantine, the Philosopher University in Nitra (Slovakia). The action research findings were juxtaposed to the interview and questionnaire results revealing 101 tourism undergraduates’ views. Despite some technical issues and the students’ mixed-language communication, both DT and PI proved to be almost as effective in a purely online environment as in the case of a traditional classroom in terms of developing foreign language competences and problem-solving skills, creative or critical thinking, as well as enhancing teamwork and motivation.","PeriodicalId":41689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Cultural Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Cultural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2022-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Design thinking (DT) and Peer Instruction (PI) are two different and seemingly distant methods. However, both rely on students’ active participation, cooperation and communication with each other. Due to these features, therefore, they have the potential to foster foreign language competences successfully. Nevertheless, what if they were employed in a purely online learning environment? Could they still bring the praised learning outcomes, such as better conceptual understanding, more effective problem-solving, communication and teamwork skills, and increased student engagement and creativity? The present study aims to answer the given question by giving insight into implementing the methods in English for Specific Purposes courses at Constantine, the Philosopher University in Nitra (Slovakia). The action research findings were juxtaposed to the interview and questionnaire results revealing 101 tourism undergraduates’ views. Despite some technical issues and the students’ mixed-language communication, both DT and PI proved to be almost as effective in a purely online environment as in the case of a traditional classroom in terms of developing foreign language competences and problem-solving skills, creative or critical thinking, as well as enhancing teamwork and motivation.
网络环境下实施设计思维与同伴教学培养旅游专业大学生英语语言能力
抽象设计思维(DT)和同伴指导(PI)是两种不同的、看似遥远的方法。然而,两者都依赖于学生的积极参与,相互合作和沟通。因此,由于这些特点,他们有可能成功地培养外语能力。然而,如果他们被雇佣在一个纯粹的在线学习环境中呢?他们是否还能带来被称赞的学习成果,例如更好的概念理解、更有效的解决问题、沟通和团队合作技能,以及提高学生的参与度和创造力?本研究旨在通过深入了解尼特拉(斯洛伐克)君士坦丁哲学家大学的特定用途英语课程的实施方法来回答给定的问题。将行动研究结果与101名旅游本科生的访谈和问卷调查结果并置。尽管存在一些技术问题和学生的混合语言交流,但事实证明,在培养外语能力和解决问题的能力、创造性或批判性思维、以及加强团队合作和激励方面,DT和PI在纯在线环境中几乎与传统课堂一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Language and Cultural Education
Journal of Language and Cultural Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信