{"title":"Vincent le Blanc as the Second Non-Muslim in Makkah and Madinah","authors":"Omer Spahic","doi":"10.32350/jitc.112.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Societies and nations generally construct their worldviews and strive to realize their religious and political objectives in the light of these worldviews. Christians of Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries began to explore the world and discovered new continents. They disseminated their views related to the peoples of the world, especially the Muslims, through their travelogues and books. It is generally acknowledged that the books published from the national pedestal are always biased. Hence, the analysis of books that are politically and religiously oriented is a very important task. Keeping this purpose in view, this article discusses the case of Vincent le Blanc as the second European non-Muslim to visit Makkah and Madinah. It argues that, in reality, the man never did as he claimed. The visit was staged mainly for the interest of Christian anti-Islamic polemics. The justification of this contention is two-pronged. Le Blanc’s fallacious, self-contradictory and irrational accounts of Makkah and Madinah, their holy mosques, and of hajj rituals are scrutinized. It is followed by bringing to fore his extensive plagiarism of the work of Ludovico di Varthema. The findings of this study suggest that the books written by tourists such as Le Blanc are characterised by biases and alienated approaches. Therefore, their propositional as well as linguistic material should always be viewed cautiously to safeguard against their misleading contents.","PeriodicalId":36736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.112.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Societies and nations generally construct their worldviews and strive to realize their religious and political objectives in the light of these worldviews. Christians of Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries began to explore the world and discovered new continents. They disseminated their views related to the peoples of the world, especially the Muslims, through their travelogues and books. It is generally acknowledged that the books published from the national pedestal are always biased. Hence, the analysis of books that are politically and religiously oriented is a very important task. Keeping this purpose in view, this article discusses the case of Vincent le Blanc as the second European non-Muslim to visit Makkah and Madinah. It argues that, in reality, the man never did as he claimed. The visit was staged mainly for the interest of Christian anti-Islamic polemics. The justification of this contention is two-pronged. Le Blanc’s fallacious, self-contradictory and irrational accounts of Makkah and Madinah, their holy mosques, and of hajj rituals are scrutinized. It is followed by bringing to fore his extensive plagiarism of the work of Ludovico di Varthema. The findings of this study suggest that the books written by tourists such as Le Blanc are characterised by biases and alienated approaches. Therefore, their propositional as well as linguistic material should always be viewed cautiously to safeguard against their misleading contents.
社会和国家通常构建他们的世界观,并努力在这些世界观的基础上实现他们的宗教和政治目标。16、17世纪,欧洲的基督徒开始探索世界,发现新大陆。他们通过游记和书籍传播他们对世界各国人民,特别是穆斯林的看法。人们普遍认为,站在国家台座上出版的书籍总是有偏见的。因此,分析具有政治和宗教倾向的书籍是一项非常重要的任务。考虑到这一目的,本文讨论了Vincent le Blanc作为第二个访问麦加和麦地那的欧洲非穆斯林的案例。它认为,在现实中,该男子从未像他所说的那样做过。这次访问主要是为了引起基督教反伊斯兰论战的兴趣。这一论点的理由有两个方面。勒布朗对麦加和麦地那、他们的神圣清真寺和朝觐仪式的谬误、自相矛盾和非理性的描述被仔细审查。其次是他对Ludovico di Varthema作品的广泛剽窃。这项研究的结果表明,像Le Blanc这样的游客所写的书具有偏见和异化方法的特点。因此,我们应该谨慎地看待它们的命题和语言材料,以防止它们的误导内容。