Evaluating US Regulations: A Comment on Joseph S. Shapiro’s “Pollution Trends and US Environmental Policy: Lessons from the Past Half Century”

IF 7.8 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
K. Segerson
{"title":"Evaluating US Regulations: A Comment on Joseph S. Shapiro’s “Pollution Trends and US Environmental Policy: Lessons from the Past Half Century”","authors":"K. Segerson","doi":"10.1086/721099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a comment on Shapiro’s “Pollution Trends and US Environmental Policy: Lessons from the Past Half Century.” It first provides some historical perspective by comparing Shapiro’s analysis and conclusions to an article published 20 years ago by A. Myrick Freeman III. It then discusses (and slightly reframes) Shapiro’s four hypotheses and highlights the importance of understanding the counterfactuals implied by each hypothesis. Finally, it suggests at least one key lesson that emerges from Shapiro’s analysis and its implications for future work—namely, the need not only to improve methods and data for analyzing existing regulations but also to increase efforts to reduce currently unregulated sources of pollution, such as agricultural pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.","PeriodicalId":47676,"journal":{"name":"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a comment on Shapiro’s “Pollution Trends and US Environmental Policy: Lessons from the Past Half Century.” It first provides some historical perspective by comparing Shapiro’s analysis and conclusions to an article published 20 years ago by A. Myrick Freeman III. It then discusses (and slightly reframes) Shapiro’s four hypotheses and highlights the importance of understanding the counterfactuals implied by each hypothesis. Finally, it suggests at least one key lesson that emerges from Shapiro’s analysis and its implications for future work—namely, the need not only to improve methods and data for analyzing existing regulations but also to increase efforts to reduce currently unregulated sources of pollution, such as agricultural pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
评价美国法规——评夏皮罗的《污染趋势与美国环境政策:半个世纪以来的教训》
本文是对夏皮罗的《污染趋势与美国环境政策:过去半个世纪的教训》的评论。首先,通过将夏皮罗的分析和结论与A.麦里克·弗里曼三世(A. Myrick Freeman III) 20年前发表的一篇文章进行比较,提供了一些历史视角。然后讨论(并稍微重新构建)夏皮罗的四个假设,并强调理解每个假设所隐含的反事实的重要性。最后,从夏皮罗的分析及其对未来工作的启示中,它至少提出了一个关键的教训,即不仅需要改进分析现有法规的方法和数据,还需要加大力度减少目前不受监管的污染源,如农业污染和温室气体排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Review of Environmental Economics and Policy fills the gap between traditional academic journals and the general interest press by providing a widely accessible yet scholarly source for the latest thinking on environmental economics and related policy. The Review publishes symposia, articles, and regular features that contribute to one or more of the following goals: •to identify and synthesize lessons learned from recent and ongoing environmental economics research; •to provide economic analysis of environmental policy issues; •to promote the sharing of ideas and perspectives among the various sub-fields of environmental economics;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信