A systematic review and meta-analysis of data use professional development interventions

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. F. Ansyari, W. Groot, Kristof De Witte
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of data use professional development interventions","authors":"M. F. Ansyari, W. Groot, Kristof De Witte","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-09-2021-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeProfessional development interventions (PDIs) are crucial for equipping teachers to use data effectively. Relying on previous studies reporting on such interventions, this paper aims to identify and synthesise the goals, dimensions and conditions of PDIs for data use. This paper also examines the evidence of the effect of such interventions on student outcomes.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, the authors employ a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to analyse teacher PDIs for data use.FindingsThe results suggest that conceptual, practical and continual goals are identified in data use PDIs. Supported by conceptual, practical or normative tools, facilitators employ a variety of techniques in facilitating teachers’ data use through data teams or professional learning communities. The facilitation techniques include assessing needs, using models or modelling, observing performance, providing feedback, providing built-in time for reflection and brokering. Further, the results highlight the influence of several conditions that contribute to the success of the interventions. Finally, the meta-analysis shows a significant positive effect of the interventions on student outcomes, with an effect size of 0.17.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors' proposed framework should be empirically tested and validated through field studies in various contexts. Since the authors focussed on studies reporting data use PDIs for instructional purposes as well as providing the descriptions of the PDIs, the number of included studies was only 27 and represented only four countries. Of the 27, 10 studies were used for the meta-analysis and the results may be subject to publication bias. Seemingly, the result may be related to the authors' inclusion/exclusion criteria that only included peer-reviewed journal articles and excluded non-peer-reviewed studies such as theses or dissertations. This criterion potentially neglected some relevant studies.Practical implicationsPolicymakers interested in developing a data use PDI should take into account the various goals of data use PDIs, depending on policymakers' interests. Building teachers’ understanding of data use can be addressed by the practical goals. This can be conducted within a short period of time through training or courses, either in-person or online. This is appropriate for an initiation strategy for data use within schools. However, targeting specific skills and dispositional attributes around data use should adopt practical and continual goals. These types of goals require a PDI with a sustained duration embedded in teachers’ classroom practices; therefore, political and practical support is necessary.Social implicationsThe authors argue that the review findings contribute to knowledge and insights by presenting data use PDIs that support teacher learning, implementation and sustainability of data use practices.Originality/valueThis article provides a proposed framework for studying teacher PDIs for data use and sheds light on several goals, a variety of facilitation strategies and conditions and the effect of the interventions on student outcomes.","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-09-2021-0055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeProfessional development interventions (PDIs) are crucial for equipping teachers to use data effectively. Relying on previous studies reporting on such interventions, this paper aims to identify and synthesise the goals, dimensions and conditions of PDIs for data use. This paper also examines the evidence of the effect of such interventions on student outcomes.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, the authors employ a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to analyse teacher PDIs for data use.FindingsThe results suggest that conceptual, practical and continual goals are identified in data use PDIs. Supported by conceptual, practical or normative tools, facilitators employ a variety of techniques in facilitating teachers’ data use through data teams or professional learning communities. The facilitation techniques include assessing needs, using models or modelling, observing performance, providing feedback, providing built-in time for reflection and brokering. Further, the results highlight the influence of several conditions that contribute to the success of the interventions. Finally, the meta-analysis shows a significant positive effect of the interventions on student outcomes, with an effect size of 0.17.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors' proposed framework should be empirically tested and validated through field studies in various contexts. Since the authors focussed on studies reporting data use PDIs for instructional purposes as well as providing the descriptions of the PDIs, the number of included studies was only 27 and represented only four countries. Of the 27, 10 studies were used for the meta-analysis and the results may be subject to publication bias. Seemingly, the result may be related to the authors' inclusion/exclusion criteria that only included peer-reviewed journal articles and excluded non-peer-reviewed studies such as theses or dissertations. This criterion potentially neglected some relevant studies.Practical implicationsPolicymakers interested in developing a data use PDI should take into account the various goals of data use PDIs, depending on policymakers' interests. Building teachers’ understanding of data use can be addressed by the practical goals. This can be conducted within a short period of time through training or courses, either in-person or online. This is appropriate for an initiation strategy for data use within schools. However, targeting specific skills and dispositional attributes around data use should adopt practical and continual goals. These types of goals require a PDI with a sustained duration embedded in teachers’ classroom practices; therefore, political and practical support is necessary.Social implicationsThe authors argue that the review findings contribute to knowledge and insights by presenting data use PDIs that support teacher learning, implementation and sustainability of data use practices.Originality/valueThis article provides a proposed framework for studying teacher PDIs for data use and sheds light on several goals, a variety of facilitation strategies and conditions and the effect of the interventions on student outcomes.
对使用专业发展干预措施的数据进行系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的专业发展干预措施(PDI)对于教师有效使用数据至关重要。根据以往关于此类干预措施的研究报告,本文旨在确定和综合PDI的目标、维度和条件,以供数据使用。本文还研究了此类干预措施对学生成绩影响的证据。设计/方法论/方法在本研究中,作者采用了系统的文献综述和荟萃分析来分析教师的个人发展指标,以供数据使用。结果表明,在数据使用PDI中确定了概念性、实践性和持续性目标。在概念、实践或规范工具的支持下,辅导员通过数据团队或专业学习社区,采用各种技术促进教师的数据使用。促进技术包括评估需求、使用模型或建模、观察绩效、提供反馈、提供反思和中介的固有时间。此外,研究结果强调了有助于干预措施成功的几种条件的影响。最后,荟萃分析显示,干预措施对学生成绩有显著的积极影响,影响大小为0.17。研究局限性/含义应通过各种背景下的实地研究对作者提出的框架进行实证检验和验证。由于作者专注于报告数据的研究,将PDI用于教学目的,并提供PDI的描述,因此纳入的研究数量仅为27项,仅代表四个国家。在27项研究中,有10项研究用于荟萃分析,其结果可能存在发表偏倚。似乎,这一结果可能与作者的入选/排除标准有关,该标准只包括同行评审的期刊文章,而排除了论文或学位论文等非同行评审的研究。这一标准可能忽略了一些相关研究。实际含义有兴趣制定数据使用PDI的政策制定者应根据政策制定者的兴趣,考虑数据使用PDIs的各种目标。建立教师对数据使用的理解可以通过实际目标来解决。这可以在短时间内通过培训或课程进行,无论是面对面还是在线。这适用于学校内部数据使用的启动策略。然而,针对数据使用的特定技能和倾向属性,应该采用实际和持续的目标。这些类型的目标需要在教师的课堂实践中嵌入持续时间的PDI;因此,政治和实际支持是必要的。社会含义作者认为,审查结果通过提供支持教师学习、实施和可持续数据使用实践的数据使用PDI,有助于知识和见解。原创性/价值本文为研究教师PDI的数据使用提供了一个拟议的框架,并阐明了几个目标、各种促进策略和条件以及干预措施对学生成绩的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Journal of Professional Capital and Community EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信