Reconstructing the global human rights order in pursuit of a binding business human rights treaty in the era of decolonisation

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW
Shelton Mota Makore, P. Osode, N. Lubisi
{"title":"Reconstructing the global human rights order in pursuit of a binding\nbusiness human rights treaty in the era of decolonisation","authors":"Shelton Mota Makore, P. Osode, N. Lubisi","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2022/12/1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current global human rights order, eminently propagated in international legal\ninstruments and statements, is to a great extent state-centric in character, bestowing\nobligations on states, whilst largely ignoring the conduct of non-state actors in the form of\ntransnational corporations (TNCs) and trade governance institutions whose record of human\nrights adherence is scarcely convincing. This inability to aptly govern the conduct of\ntransnational entities, even when it is evident that their power now eclipses that of states,\nraises the concern that the extant human rights regime is a neoliberal construct advancing\nmarket fundamentalism and widening the economic disparities between developed and\ndeveloping countries. This article unsettles the doctrinal foundations underlying state\ncentrism in international human rights law, arguing that such a version of human rights is\nexposing developing countries to neoliberal oligarchs, and market deficiencies, which if not\nreformed, may entrench underdevelopment. It calls for a decolonised human rights regime\nwhich impose human rights obligations on the conduct of transnational entities in pursuit of\nhuman dignity, equality and freedom.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2022/12/1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current global human rights order, eminently propagated in international legal instruments and statements, is to a great extent state-centric in character, bestowing obligations on states, whilst largely ignoring the conduct of non-state actors in the form of transnational corporations (TNCs) and trade governance institutions whose record of human rights adherence is scarcely convincing. This inability to aptly govern the conduct of transnational entities, even when it is evident that their power now eclipses that of states, raises the concern that the extant human rights regime is a neoliberal construct advancing market fundamentalism and widening the economic disparities between developed and developing countries. This article unsettles the doctrinal foundations underlying state centrism in international human rights law, arguing that such a version of human rights is exposing developing countries to neoliberal oligarchs, and market deficiencies, which if not reformed, may entrench underdevelopment. It calls for a decolonised human rights regime which impose human rights obligations on the conduct of transnational entities in pursuit of human dignity, equality and freedom.
在非殖民化时代,重建全球人权秩序,追求具有约束力的商业人权条约
目前的全球人权秩序在国际法律文书和声明中得到了广泛宣传,在很大程度上是以国家为中心的,赋予国家义务,而在很大程度上将跨国公司和贸易治理机构等非国家行为者的行为忽视,这些非国家行为者遵守人权的记录几乎令人信服。这种无法恰当地管理跨国实体的行为,即使很明显,跨国实体的权力现在盖过了国家的权力,也引发了人们的担忧,即现有的人权制度是一种新自由主义结构,促进了市场原教旨主义,并扩大了发达国家和发展中国家之间的经济差距。这篇文章动摇了国际人权法中国家中心主义的理论基础,认为这种人权形式将发展中国家暴露在新自由主义寡头之下,而市场缺陷如果不加以改革,可能会加剧不发达。它呼吁建立一个非殖民化的人权登记制度,将人权义务强加给跨国实体追求人类尊严、平等和自由的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信