A systematic review of barriers impeding the implementation of government green procurement

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Navarani Vejaratnam, Z. Mohamad, S. Chenayah
{"title":"A systematic review of barriers impeding the implementation of government green procurement","authors":"Navarani Vejaratnam, Z. Mohamad, S. Chenayah","doi":"10.1108/jopp-02-2020-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Government green procurement (GGP) is becoming a popular environmental policy instrument to spur the economy whilst protecting the environment. However, the implementation of GGP is impeded by various barriers. This paper aims to analyse the existing literature on barriers impeding GGP.,This systematic literature review was guided by the PRISMA Statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) review method. A total of 29 articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases were selected for the review.,Five themes, i.e. finance, legal, people, knowledge and organisation, emerged from this review, which further produced 16 sub-themes. Lack of knowledge and awareness were the major barriers for GGP, while financial constraint was not the major barrier for GGP, as previously perceived. Barriers related to organisation were the most complex. Certain barriers were found more in developed or developing countries.,Only article journals with empirical data were selected. Review articles, book series, books, chapters in books and conference proceedings were excluded.,Public managers should place highest priority to enhance knowledge and awareness of procurers on GGP. Other important initiatives to be undertaken include emulating best practices, implementing change management and incentivising suppliers to tackle the prevalent barriers of GGP. Finally, with increasing evidences on barriers related to GGP, public managers should consider mapping and analysing specific barriers hindering GGP in their organisation/country.,A less challenging and efficient implementation of GGP contributes to a cleaner environment.,This article will be the first to systematically review the barriers of GGP.","PeriodicalId":45136,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Procurement","volume":"20 1","pages":"451-471"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jopp-02-2020-0013","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Procurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-02-2020-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Government green procurement (GGP) is becoming a popular environmental policy instrument to spur the economy whilst protecting the environment. However, the implementation of GGP is impeded by various barriers. This paper aims to analyse the existing literature on barriers impeding GGP.,This systematic literature review was guided by the PRISMA Statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) review method. A total of 29 articles from the Scopus and Web of Science databases were selected for the review.,Five themes, i.e. finance, legal, people, knowledge and organisation, emerged from this review, which further produced 16 sub-themes. Lack of knowledge and awareness were the major barriers for GGP, while financial constraint was not the major barrier for GGP, as previously perceived. Barriers related to organisation were the most complex. Certain barriers were found more in developed or developing countries.,Only article journals with empirical data were selected. Review articles, book series, books, chapters in books and conference proceedings were excluded.,Public managers should place highest priority to enhance knowledge and awareness of procurers on GGP. Other important initiatives to be undertaken include emulating best practices, implementing change management and incentivising suppliers to tackle the prevalent barriers of GGP. Finally, with increasing evidences on barriers related to GGP, public managers should consider mapping and analysing specific barriers hindering GGP in their organisation/country.,A less challenging and efficient implementation of GGP contributes to a cleaner environment.,This article will be the first to systematically review the barriers of GGP.
阻碍政府绿色采购实施的障碍的系统审查
政府绿色采购(GGP)正在成为一种流行的环境政策工具,以刺激经济,同时保护环境。然而,GGP的实施受到各种障碍的阻碍。本文旨在分析现有文献中阻碍GGP的障碍。本系统文献综述采用PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for systematic Reviews and meta - analysis)综述方法。共从Scopus和Web of Science数据库中选择了29篇文章进行审查。本次审查产生了五个主题,即金融、法律、人、知识和组织,并进一步产生了16个分主题。缺乏知识和认识是GGP的主要障碍,而财政限制并不是以前认为的GGP的主要障碍。与组织相关的障碍最为复杂。某些障碍更多地出现在发达国家或发展中国家。,仅选取具有实证数据的文章期刊。综述文章、丛书、书籍、书籍章节和会议论文集被排除在外。,公共管理人员应优先提高采购人员对全球生产总值的认识和认识。要采取的其他重要举措包括模仿最佳做法,实施变革管理和激励供应商解决普遍存在的GGP障碍。最后,随着越来越多的证据表明与GGP相关的障碍,公共管理者应该考虑绘制和分析阻碍其组织/国家GGP的具体障碍。减少挑战和有效地实施GGP有助于更清洁的环境。本文将首次系统地回顾GGP的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Procurement
Journal of Public Procurement PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Procurement (JOPP) seeks to further the understanding of public procurement. JOPP publishes original, high-quality research that explores the theories and practices of public procurement. The journal ensures that high-quality research is collected and disseminated widely to both academics and practitioners, and provides a forum for debate. It covers all subjects relating to the purchase of goods, services and works by public organizations at a local, regional, national and international level. JOPP is multi-disciplinary, with a broad approach towards methods and styles of research as well as the level of issues addressed. The Journal welcomes the submission of papers from researchers internationally. The journal welcomes research papers, narrative essays, exemplar cases, forums, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信