Prospects and Problems of Realization of the VAT Neutrality Principle in Russia and China

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
O. Karpova, I. Mayburov, Yongmao Fan
{"title":"Prospects and Problems of Realization of the VAT Neutrality Principle in Russia and China","authors":"O. Karpova, I. Mayburov, Yongmao Fan","doi":"10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principle of neutrality lies at the core of the European VAT model. In other models, this principle is deemed less important. The most illustrative in this respect is the Chinese VAT system, in which the government has departed from the neutrality principle in order to be able to regulate export structure more efficiently. Since Russia with its resource-oriented export structure is now facing a similar challenge, it may benefit from adopting some of the relevant Chinese experience and thus improve the export potential of its non-resource industries, which is the question this paper seeks to explore. Our hypothesis is that differentiated export VAT refund rates, which signifies a deviation from the VAT neutrality principle, can be used for export regulation. The research relies on the comparative analysis method and the method of analogy. We conducted a detailed analysis of VAT neutrality by focusing on the constitutive elements of the VAT (object of taxation, subject of taxation, tax rates and tax period) and the corresponding types of neutrality. We also compared realization of different neutrality types in China and Russia and the resulting distortionary effects. Our analysis has shown that significant distortions of the VAT neutrality principle are observed in both systems. Some of the elements from the Chinese model can be adopted in Russia, for example, the system of incomplete VAT refunds to exporters. In order to evaluate exporters’ credibility, two criteria may be applied. First, their credibility may be assessed with the help of the Automated System for Monitoring VAT Refunds. Second, companies participating in industrial charters and associations can be deemed more credible than those that don’t. These two criteria could underpin the application of reducing coefficients. The algorithm for setting the values of these coefficients is described. For the second criterion, we calculated the effect that would be achieved if the export coefficients are introduced. Our study has shown that in the Russian context, differentiated export VAT refund rates could open new opportunities for regulation of the export structure and enhance tax compliance of exporting companies. For citation Karpova O.M., Mayburov I.A., Yong Fan. Prospects and Problems of Realization of the VAT Neutrality Principle in Russia and China. Journal of Tax Reform. 2020;6(2):124–141. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.078. Article info Received June 19, 2020; Revised July 20, 2020; Accepted August 8, 2020","PeriodicalId":53924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tax Reform","volume":"6 1","pages":"124-141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tax Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The principle of neutrality lies at the core of the European VAT model. In other models, this principle is deemed less important. The most illustrative in this respect is the Chinese VAT system, in which the government has departed from the neutrality principle in order to be able to regulate export structure more efficiently. Since Russia with its resource-oriented export structure is now facing a similar challenge, it may benefit from adopting some of the relevant Chinese experience and thus improve the export potential of its non-resource industries, which is the question this paper seeks to explore. Our hypothesis is that differentiated export VAT refund rates, which signifies a deviation from the VAT neutrality principle, can be used for export regulation. The research relies on the comparative analysis method and the method of analogy. We conducted a detailed analysis of VAT neutrality by focusing on the constitutive elements of the VAT (object of taxation, subject of taxation, tax rates and tax period) and the corresponding types of neutrality. We also compared realization of different neutrality types in China and Russia and the resulting distortionary effects. Our analysis has shown that significant distortions of the VAT neutrality principle are observed in both systems. Some of the elements from the Chinese model can be adopted in Russia, for example, the system of incomplete VAT refunds to exporters. In order to evaluate exporters’ credibility, two criteria may be applied. First, their credibility may be assessed with the help of the Automated System for Monitoring VAT Refunds. Second, companies participating in industrial charters and associations can be deemed more credible than those that don’t. These two criteria could underpin the application of reducing coefficients. The algorithm for setting the values of these coefficients is described. For the second criterion, we calculated the effect that would be achieved if the export coefficients are introduced. Our study has shown that in the Russian context, differentiated export VAT refund rates could open new opportunities for regulation of the export structure and enhance tax compliance of exporting companies. For citation Karpova O.M., Mayburov I.A., Yong Fan. Prospects and Problems of Realization of the VAT Neutrality Principle in Russia and China. Journal of Tax Reform. 2020;6(2):124–141. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.078. Article info Received June 19, 2020; Revised July 20, 2020; Accepted August 8, 2020
俄罗斯和中国实现增值税中立原则的前景与问题
中性原则是欧洲增值税模式的核心。在其他模型中,这一原则被认为不那么重要。在这方面最能说明问题的是中国的增值税制度,政府为了能够更有效地调节出口结构而背离了中立原则。由于资源导向型出口结构的俄罗斯目前也面临着类似的挑战,因此可以借鉴中国的一些相关经验,从而提高其非资源产业的出口潜力,这是本文试图探讨的问题。我们的假设是,差异化的出口增值税退税率意味着对增值税中性原则的偏离,可以用于出口管制。本研究主要采用比较分析法和类比法。本文从增值税的构成要素(征税对象、征税主体、税率和纳税期限)和相应的中性类型入手,对增值税中性进行了详细分析。我们还比较了中国和俄罗斯不同中立性类型的实现以及由此产生的扭曲效应。我们的分析表明,在这两个系统中都观察到增值税中立原则的显著扭曲。中国模式的一些元素可以在俄罗斯采用,例如,对出口商的不完全增值税退税制度。为了评估出口商的信誉,可以采用两个标准。首先,他们的信誉可以在增值税退税自动监控系统的帮助下进行评估。其次,参加行业章程和协会的公司被认为比那些没有参加的公司更可信。这两个准则可以作为约简系数应用的基础。描述了设置这些系数值的算法。对于第二个标准,我们计算了如果引入出口系数将达到的效果。我们的研究表明,在俄罗斯的背景下,差异化的出口增值税退税率可以为出口结构的监管开辟新的机会,提高出口公司的税收合规性。引证Karpova o.m., mayburrov i.a., Yong Fan。俄罗斯和中国实现增值税中立原则的前景与问题。税改学报,2020;6(2):124-141。DOI: 10.15826 / jtr.2020.6.2.078。收稿日期:2020年6月19日;2020年7月20日修订;2020年8月8日录用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tax Reform
Journal of Tax Reform BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信