Community perspectives of former terrorist combatants, militants and reintegration programmes in Nigeria: a systematic review

IF 1.3 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
T. Ike, Danny Singh, S. Murphy, D. Jidong, F. Porritt, E. E. Ayobi
{"title":"Community perspectives of former terrorist combatants, militants and reintegration programmes in Nigeria: a systematic review","authors":"T. Ike, Danny Singh, S. Murphy, D. Jidong, F. Porritt, E. E. Ayobi","doi":"10.1080/19434472.2020.1834431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Community perspectives of repentant terrorist combatants and militants alongside the trust accorded reintegration programmes are important for successful reintegration. This review attempt to fill a significant gap through the synthesis of evidence on community perspectives of interventions adopted to foster reintegration of former terrorist combatants and militants in Nigeria. Six databases including the International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Applied Social Science Index and Abstracts, Web of Science, Scopus, Proquest and EBsco were searched. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Informed by the principles of thematic analysis and conceptual framework of synthesis, five themes emerged: (1) Design of reintegration programmes devoid of community consultation; (2) Scepticism towards the sincerity behind monetising rehabilitation and reintegration programmes; (3) Resistance towards reintegration due to perceived favourable incentives provided to repentant combatants; (4) Lack of confidence in the genuine repentance of former repentant combatants; and (5) Lack of confidence in government’s reintegration programme. The review recommends randomised controlled trials which incorporate context-specific community-centred interventions to encourage successful reintegration.","PeriodicalId":54174,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","volume":"14 1","pages":"142 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19434472.2020.1834431","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2020.1834431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT Community perspectives of repentant terrorist combatants and militants alongside the trust accorded reintegration programmes are important for successful reintegration. This review attempt to fill a significant gap through the synthesis of evidence on community perspectives of interventions adopted to foster reintegration of former terrorist combatants and militants in Nigeria. Six databases including the International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Applied Social Science Index and Abstracts, Web of Science, Scopus, Proquest and EBsco were searched. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Informed by the principles of thematic analysis and conceptual framework of synthesis, five themes emerged: (1) Design of reintegration programmes devoid of community consultation; (2) Scepticism towards the sincerity behind monetising rehabilitation and reintegration programmes; (3) Resistance towards reintegration due to perceived favourable incentives provided to repentant combatants; (4) Lack of confidence in the genuine repentance of former repentant combatants; and (5) Lack of confidence in government’s reintegration programme. The review recommends randomised controlled trials which incorporate context-specific community-centred interventions to encourage successful reintegration.
尼日利亚前恐怖主义战斗人员、武装分子和重返社会方案的社区观点:系统审查
社区对悔过自新的恐怖主义战斗人员和武装分子的看法,以及给予信任的重返社会方案,对于成功重返社会至关重要。这项审查试图通过综合证据,从社区角度看待为促进尼日利亚前恐怖主义战斗人员和武装分子重返社会而采取的干预措施,填补一个重大空白。检索了《国际社会科学参考书目》、《应用社会科学索引与摘要》、《科学网》、《Scopus》、《Proquest》和《EBsco》等6个数据库。18项研究符合纳入标准。根据专题分析原则和综合概念框架,出现了五个主题:(1)在没有社区协商的情况下设计重返社会方案;(2) 对康复和重返社会方案货币化背后的诚意持怀疑态度;(3) 由于认为向悔过自新的战斗人员提供了有利的激励措施而对重返社会产生抵制;(4) 对悔过的前战斗人员的真正悔过缺乏信心;(5)对政府的重返社会方案缺乏信心。该审查建议进行随机对照试验,结合特定背景的以社区为中心的干预措施,以鼓励成功重返社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信