The analysis of the factor that causes fraudulent financial reporting with fraud diamond

Ni Komang Astri Yulistyawati, I. Suardikha, I. P. Sudana
{"title":"The analysis of the factor that causes fraudulent financial reporting with fraud diamond","authors":"Ni Komang Astri Yulistyawati, I. Suardikha, I. P. Sudana","doi":"10.20885/JAAI.VOL23.ISS1.ART1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to obtain empirical evidence of the influence of the elements of fraud diamond namely: pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and capability on fraudulent financial reporting. The samples in the study were selected by usifigureng a non-probability sampling technique with a purposive sampling method with a total number of samples that met the sample selection criteria of 76 samples, namely 19 manufacturing companies during the four years of the 2011–2014 observation period. The collected data were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. Fraudulent financial reporting was measured using Dechow et al's F-Score (2007) which can be included as a first-pass test in evaluating the possibility of manipulation. This research showed that opportunity and rationalization are proven to be fraud diamond elements that most influence the occurrence of fraudulent financial reporting in the companies. While pressure and capability have no effect on fraudulent financial reporting. The implication of this study is that the ratio of total inventory as a proxy for opportunity measurement and the ratio of total accrual to total assets as a proxy for measurement of rationalization has a significant effect on fraudulent financial reporting, meaning that these ratios can be used by management to detect fraudulent financial reporting practices in manufacturing companies.","PeriodicalId":33152,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/JAAI.VOL23.ISS1.ART1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to obtain empirical evidence of the influence of the elements of fraud diamond namely: pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and capability on fraudulent financial reporting. The samples in the study were selected by usifigureng a non-probability sampling technique with a purposive sampling method with a total number of samples that met the sample selection criteria of 76 samples, namely 19 manufacturing companies during the four years of the 2011–2014 observation period. The collected data were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. Fraudulent financial reporting was measured using Dechow et al's F-Score (2007) which can be included as a first-pass test in evaluating the possibility of manipulation. This research showed that opportunity and rationalization are proven to be fraud diamond elements that most influence the occurrence of fraudulent financial reporting in the companies. While pressure and capability have no effect on fraudulent financial reporting. The implication of this study is that the ratio of total inventory as a proxy for opportunity measurement and the ratio of total accrual to total assets as a proxy for measurement of rationalization has a significant effect on fraudulent financial reporting, meaning that these ratios can be used by management to detect fraudulent financial reporting practices in manufacturing companies.
欺诈钻石导致财务报告舞弊的因素分析
本研究的目的是获得欺诈钻石要素的影响的经验证据,即:压力、机会、合理化和能力对欺诈财务报告的影响。研究中的样本是通过非概率抽样技术和有目的的抽样方法选择的,在2011-2014年的四年观察期内,符合样本选择标准的样本总数为76个,即19家制造公司。通过多元线性回归分析对收集的数据进行分析。欺诈性财务报告是使用Dechow等人的F-Score(2007)来衡量的,该分数可以作为评估操纵可能性的第一次通过测试。这项研究表明,机会和合理化被证明是影响公司财务报告欺诈发生的欺诈钻石因素。而压力和能力对欺诈性财务报告没有影响。本研究的含义是,作为机会衡量指标的总库存比率和作为合理化衡量指标的应计总额与总资产比率对欺诈性财务报告有显著影响,这意味着管理层可以利用这些比率来检测制造公司的欺诈性财务报告行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信