From social marketing and service-dominant logic to engagement in mindfulness practice: a field experiment

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS
Carolina Pantuza Vilar dos Santos, E. Lopes, J. C. Dias, André Gustavo Pereira de Andrade, C. Matos, R. Veiga
{"title":"From social marketing and service-dominant logic to engagement in mindfulness practice: a field experiment","authors":"Carolina Pantuza Vilar dos Santos, E. Lopes, J. C. Dias, André Gustavo Pereira de Andrade, C. Matos, R. Veiga","doi":"10.1108/RAUSP-10-2020-0247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the assumption of the service-dominant logic (S-D logic) that every exchange is service-for-service and on the relevance of the beneficiary’s role in the co-creation of value, this paper aims to investigate the effects of engagement in the context of social marketing, where the value proposition is an invitation to practice mindfulness.,A field experiment was carried out with 72 volunteers, using a pre-test/post-test control group design. The treatment applied was a set of strategies to increase the engagement of the participants to attain a better result in five dependent variables associated mainly with the benefits of mindfulness practice. Measurements were made from a profile analysis, and submitted to Mann-Whitney and t-tests.,A large effect of group and time factors were observed in the multivariate test, as well as differences in the co-creation of value between groups.,This study can contribute to stimulate experimental transdisciplinary research in humans, using concepts from S-D logic and social marketing to promote positive behavioral change. This approach is probably more efficient at explaining and improving human behavior, given its complex nature.","PeriodicalId":43400,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-10-2020-0247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the assumption of the service-dominant logic (S-D logic) that every exchange is service-for-service and on the relevance of the beneficiary’s role in the co-creation of value, this paper aims to investigate the effects of engagement in the context of social marketing, where the value proposition is an invitation to practice mindfulness.,A field experiment was carried out with 72 volunteers, using a pre-test/post-test control group design. The treatment applied was a set of strategies to increase the engagement of the participants to attain a better result in five dependent variables associated mainly with the benefits of mindfulness practice. Measurements were made from a profile analysis, and submitted to Mann-Whitney and t-tests.,A large effect of group and time factors were observed in the multivariate test, as well as differences in the co-creation of value between groups.,This study can contribute to stimulate experimental transdisciplinary research in humans, using concepts from S-D logic and social marketing to promote positive behavioral change. This approach is probably more efficient at explaining and improving human behavior, given its complex nature.
从社会营销和服务主导逻辑参与正念实践:一个实地实验
基于服务主导逻辑(S-D逻辑)的假设,即每次交换都是以服务换服务,以及受益人在共同创造价值中的角色的相关性,本文旨在研究社会营销背景下的参与效应,其中价值主张是邀请实践正念。采用前测/后测对照组设计,对72名志愿者进行现场实验。所采用的治疗是一套策略,以增加参与者的参与度,从而在五个主要与正念练习的好处相关的因变量中获得更好的结果。测量是通过侧写分析得出的,并提交了曼-惠特尼检验和t检验。在多变量检验中,发现群体因素和时间因素的影响较大,群体之间共同创造价值的差异也较大。利用S-D逻辑和社会营销的概念来促进积极的行为改变,可以促进人类跨学科的实验研究。考虑到人类行为的复杂性,这种方法在解释和改善人类行为方面可能更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信