J. Saavedra, Kristján Halldórsson, Hafrún Kristjánsdóttir, Sveinn Þorgeirsson, Geir Sveinsson
{"title":"Anthropometric characteristics, physical fitness and the prediction of throwing velocity in\nhandball men young players","authors":"J. Saavedra, Kristján Halldórsson, Hafrún Kristjánsdóttir, Sveinn Þorgeirsson, Geir Sveinsson","doi":"10.26582/k.51.2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of\nthis study were: (i) to analyse anthropometric parameters, physical fitness,\nand throwing velocity of handball male elite youth players of different ages;\nand (ii) to develop a multivariate model that explains throwing velocity.\nFifty-three handball men players (17.99±1.68 years old), members of the\nIcelandic National Teams, participated in the study. The participants were\nclassified into the U21 National Team (n=12), U19 National Team (n=17), and U17\nNational Team (n=24). All were evaluated by basic anthropometry (body height,\nbody mass, body mass index), physical fitness tests (counter movement jump,\nmedicine ball throw, hand dynamometry, 10 m and 30 m sprint, yo-yo IR2 test)\nand ball speed after various handball throws at goal (a 7-m throw, a 9-m\nground shot after a three-step run-up, and a 9-m jump shot after a three-step\napproach). A one-way analysis of variance with a Bonferroni post-hoc\ntest was used to establish the differences between the teams. Multiple linear\nregression was used to predict the speed of the ball from each of the three\nshots taken for each team. There were no differences between the U21 and U19\nteams except for the medicine ball throw, but the U19 team scored better than\nthe U17 team in almost all variables. Ball speed after a handball shot was\npredicted (between 22% and 70% of accuracy) with only one or two physical\nfitness variables in each model ‒ medicine ball throw (in four models), counter\nmovement jump (in two models), and 10 m sprint (in two models), being the\nvariables that were most selective.","PeriodicalId":49943,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.26582/k.51.2.14","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26582/k.51.2.14","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
The objectives of
this study were: (i) to analyse anthropometric parameters, physical fitness,
and throwing velocity of handball male elite youth players of different ages;
and (ii) to develop a multivariate model that explains throwing velocity.
Fifty-three handball men players (17.99±1.68 years old), members of the
Icelandic National Teams, participated in the study. The participants were
classified into the U21 National Team (n=12), U19 National Team (n=17), and U17
National Team (n=24). All were evaluated by basic anthropometry (body height,
body mass, body mass index), physical fitness tests (counter movement jump,
medicine ball throw, hand dynamometry, 10 m and 30 m sprint, yo-yo IR2 test)
and ball speed after various handball throws at goal (a 7-m throw, a 9-m
ground shot after a three-step run-up, and a 9-m jump shot after a three-step
approach). A one-way analysis of variance with a Bonferroni post-hoc
test was used to establish the differences between the teams. Multiple linear
regression was used to predict the speed of the ball from each of the three
shots taken for each team. There were no differences between the U21 and U19
teams except for the medicine ball throw, but the U19 team scored better than
the U17 team in almost all variables. Ball speed after a handball shot was
predicted (between 22% and 70% of accuracy) with only one or two physical
fitness variables in each model ‒ medicine ball throw (in four models), counter
movement jump (in two models), and 10 m sprint (in two models), being the
variables that were most selective.
期刊介绍:
Kinesiology – International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Kinesiology (print ISSN 1331- 1441, online ISSN 1848-638X) publishes twice a year scientific papers and other written material from kinesiology (a scientific discipline which investigates art and science of human movement; in the meaning and scope close to the idiom “sport sciences”) and other adjacent human sciences focused on sport and exercise, primarily from anthropology (biological and cultural alike), medicine, sociology, psychology, natural sciences and mathematics applied to sport in its broadest sense, history, and others. Contributions of high scientific interest, including also results of theoretical analyses and their practical application in physical education, sport, physical recreation and kinesitherapy, are accepted for publication. The following sections define the scope of the journal: Sport and sports activities, Physical education, Recreation/leisure, Kinesiological anthropology, Training methods, Biology of sport and exercise, Sports medicine and physiology of sport, Biomechanics, History of sport and Book reviews with news.