The Five-Factor Model of Indigenous Studies: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Postsecondary Indigenous Studies Websites in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand

A. Murry, Tyara Marchand, Emily Wang, Daniel Voth
{"title":"The Five-Factor Model of Indigenous Studies: A Quantitative Content Analysis of Postsecondary Indigenous Studies Websites in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand","authors":"A. Murry, Tyara Marchand, Emily Wang, Daniel Voth","doi":"10.1353/jaie.2022.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Indigenous Studies (IS) is a multidisciplinary academic discipline chartered to offer more than just an education about Indigenous peoples. Indigenous Studies is a fought-for space on campus to properly represent the perspectives, processes, and communities of Indigenous peoples, for the benefit of Indigenous communities, organizations, and interests. Unfortunately, the extent to which IS fulfills its mission is ambiguous due to the wide variation in IS program composition, the broad scope of the discipline’s topical foci, and the lack of parameters or core ingredients that distinguish it from other disciplines. In this article, we describe the process and results of a content analysis of IS websites in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The goal of this study was to identify the major features of IS internationally and to show how IS programs vary in their embodiment of those major features. After an extensive coding process, we ran an exploratory factor analysis on the quantitative codings to derive a five-factor model of IS. Accordingly, IS included (1) Indigenous methodologies, (2) Indigenous community member involvement, (3) Indigenous Ways of Knowing and Doing, (4) Indigenous languages, and (5) Indigenous student community. How much these factors were emphasized depended on the country, institution type, and level of degree offered, controlling for website complexity and aesthetics. Our findings show that there is common ground across IS programs internationally, according to their websites, but that some countries (e.g., Canada), institution types (e.g., tribal colleges), and degree programs (e.g., undergraduate) reflect these factors more than others.","PeriodicalId":90572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American Indian education","volume":"61 1","pages":"50 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American Indian education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jaie.2022.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Indigenous Studies (IS) is a multidisciplinary academic discipline chartered to offer more than just an education about Indigenous peoples. Indigenous Studies is a fought-for space on campus to properly represent the perspectives, processes, and communities of Indigenous peoples, for the benefit of Indigenous communities, organizations, and interests. Unfortunately, the extent to which IS fulfills its mission is ambiguous due to the wide variation in IS program composition, the broad scope of the discipline’s topical foci, and the lack of parameters or core ingredients that distinguish it from other disciplines. In this article, we describe the process and results of a content analysis of IS websites in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The goal of this study was to identify the major features of IS internationally and to show how IS programs vary in their embodiment of those major features. After an extensive coding process, we ran an exploratory factor analysis on the quantitative codings to derive a five-factor model of IS. Accordingly, IS included (1) Indigenous methodologies, (2) Indigenous community member involvement, (3) Indigenous Ways of Knowing and Doing, (4) Indigenous languages, and (5) Indigenous student community. How much these factors were emphasized depended on the country, institution type, and level of degree offered, controlling for website complexity and aesthetics. Our findings show that there is common ground across IS programs internationally, according to their websites, but that some countries (e.g., Canada), institution types (e.g., tribal colleges), and degree programs (e.g., undergraduate) reflect these factors more than others.
土着研究的五因素模型:加拿大、美国、澳大利亚和新西兰高等教育土着研究网站的定量内容分析
摘要:土著研究(IS)是一门多学科的学术学科,旨在提供不仅仅是关于土著人民的教育。为了土著社区、组织和利益的利益,土著研究是一场争取校园空间的斗争,以适当地代表土著人民的观点、过程和社区。不幸的是,由于IS项目组成的广泛变化,学科主题焦点的广泛范围,以及缺乏将其与其他学科区分开来的参数或核心成分,因此IS完成其使命的程度是模糊的。在本文中,我们描述了对美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰的IS网站进行内容分析的过程和结果。本研究的目的是确定国际上IS的主要特征,并展示IS项目在体现这些主要特征方面的差异。经过广泛的编码过程,我们对定量编码进行了探索性因子分析,得出了IS的五因子模型。因此,IS包括(1)土著方法,(2)土著社区成员参与,(3)土著的认知和行为方式,(4)土著语言,以及(5)土著学生社区。这些因素被强调的程度取决于国家、机构类型和提供的学位水平,控制网站的复杂性和美观性。我们的研究结果表明,根据他们的网站,国际上的信息系统项目有共同点,但一些国家(如加拿大)、机构类型(如部落学院)和学位项目(如本科)比其他国家更能反映这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信