Contestation between Puritan Islam and Kejawen in the Urban Yogyakarta of Indonesia

AlAlbab Pub Date : 2019-12-30 DOI:10.24260/ALALBAB.V8I2.1460
M. Arifin, I. Abdullah, Atik Tri Ratnawati
{"title":"Contestation between Puritan Islam and Kejawen in the Urban Yogyakarta of Indonesia","authors":"M. Arifin, I. Abdullah, Atik Tri Ratnawati","doi":"10.24260/ALALBAB.V8I2.1460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tensions between Puritan Islam and Kejawen Islam have never been resolved, despite various accommodation efforts. The ongoing contestation of the two traditions in Islam in Yogyakarta is because both always maintain strict cultural boundaries through symbols that represent their respective identities, be it in religious, art, cultural, economic and political practices. This study focuses on three aspects: (1) the form of representation of the contestation between Islam and Tradition (Kejawen) in the city of Yogyakarta; (2) the historical and cultural context which is the basis for the contestation between Islam and tradition; and (3) how the contestation between Islam and the Kejawen tradition is managed by each community in an effort to minimize the occurrence of social conflict between the two. Through these three aspects, this research aims to offer a new perspective in viewing the dialectical relations between Puritan Islam and Javanese (Kejawen) tradition contextually. The contestation between the Islamic tradition and the Kejawen tradition continued because of historical, political and global currents that provided space for both traditions to build their respective cultural identities.","PeriodicalId":31284,"journal":{"name":"AlAlbab","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlAlbab","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24260/ALALBAB.V8I2.1460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Tensions between Puritan Islam and Kejawen Islam have never been resolved, despite various accommodation efforts. The ongoing contestation of the two traditions in Islam in Yogyakarta is because both always maintain strict cultural boundaries through symbols that represent their respective identities, be it in religious, art, cultural, economic and political practices. This study focuses on three aspects: (1) the form of representation of the contestation between Islam and Tradition (Kejawen) in the city of Yogyakarta; (2) the historical and cultural context which is the basis for the contestation between Islam and tradition; and (3) how the contestation between Islam and the Kejawen tradition is managed by each community in an effort to minimize the occurrence of social conflict between the two. Through these three aspects, this research aims to offer a new perspective in viewing the dialectical relations between Puritan Islam and Javanese (Kejawen) tradition contextually. The contestation between the Islamic tradition and the Kejawen tradition continued because of historical, political and global currents that provided space for both traditions to build their respective cultural identities.
印尼日惹城市中清教徒伊斯兰教与金戈威德民兵的冲突
尽管做出了各种通融努力,但清教徒伊斯兰教和凯戈温派伊斯兰教之间的紧张关系从未得到解决。日惹伊斯兰教中这两种传统的持续争论是因为无论是在宗教、艺术、文化、经济和政治实践中,两者都始终通过代表各自身份的符号来保持严格的文化界限。本研究主要集中在三个方面:(1)日惹市伊斯兰教与传统(金戈威德)之争的表现形式;(2) 历史文化语境是伊斯兰教与传统之争的基础;以及(3)每个社区如何管理伊斯兰教和金戈威德民兵传统之间的争论,以尽量减少两者之间社会冲突的发生。通过这三个方面,本研究旨在提供一个新的视角来看待清教徒伊斯兰教与爪哇传统之间的辩证关系。伊斯兰传统和金戈威德传统之间的争论仍在继续,因为历史、政治和全球潮流为这两种传统提供了建立各自文化特征的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信