Trying to Reverse Demographic Decline: Pro-Natalist and Family Policies in Russia, Poland and Hungary

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
L. Cook, E. Iarskaia-Smirnova, V. Kozlov
{"title":"Trying to Reverse Demographic Decline: Pro-Natalist and Family Policies in Russia, Poland and Hungary","authors":"L. Cook, E. Iarskaia-Smirnova, V. Kozlov","doi":"10.1017/S1474746422000628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the early 2000s governments in Russia, Poland and Hungary declared demographic crises and adopted pro-natalist programmes to increase fertility, as well as policies to support families with children. Our article compares their ‘flagship’ pro-natalist programmes: Russia’s Maternity Capital, Poland’s Family 500+, and Hungary’s enhanced earned income tax credit, all framed by governments’ neo-familialist discourses. We confirm these policies had limited impacts on fertility, finding that their most significant and disparate effects were instead on childhood poverty. Provision of preschool public childcare and parental leaves with levels of mothers’ employment across the cases were compared. We find no relationship between coverage of childcare institutions and employment rates of mothers with young children. Data show a weak relationship between length and compensation for parental leaves and maternal employment. We conclude that post-communist governments’ flagship pro-natalist incentives, family policies and traditionalist rhetoric have had limited effects in reversing demographic decline or in re-traditionalising contemporary women’s lives.","PeriodicalId":47397,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy and Society","volume":"22 1","pages":"355 - 375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746422000628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

During the early 2000s governments in Russia, Poland and Hungary declared demographic crises and adopted pro-natalist programmes to increase fertility, as well as policies to support families with children. Our article compares their ‘flagship’ pro-natalist programmes: Russia’s Maternity Capital, Poland’s Family 500+, and Hungary’s enhanced earned income tax credit, all framed by governments’ neo-familialist discourses. We confirm these policies had limited impacts on fertility, finding that their most significant and disparate effects were instead on childhood poverty. Provision of preschool public childcare and parental leaves with levels of mothers’ employment across the cases were compared. We find no relationship between coverage of childcare institutions and employment rates of mothers with young children. Data show a weak relationship between length and compensation for parental leaves and maternal employment. We conclude that post-communist governments’ flagship pro-natalist incentives, family policies and traditionalist rhetoric have had limited effects in reversing demographic decline or in re-traditionalising contemporary women’s lives.
试图扭转人口下降:亲生育和家庭政策在俄罗斯,波兰和匈牙利
21世纪初,俄罗斯、波兰和匈牙利政府宣布出现人口危机,并采取了支持生育的计划来提高生育率,并出台了支持有孩子家庭的政策。我们的文章比较了他们的“旗舰”亲生育计划:俄罗斯的“生育之都”,波兰的“家庭500+”,以及匈牙利加强的劳动所得税抵免,所有这些都是政府新家庭主义话语的框架。我们确认这些政策对生育率的影响有限,发现它们最显著和最不同的影响是对儿童贫困的影响。在不同的情况下,比较了学前公共托儿服务和育儿假的提供与母亲就业水平的关系。我们发现托儿机构的覆盖率与有幼儿的母亲的就业率之间没有关系。数据显示,产假长短与产假补偿和母亲就业之间的关系很弱。我们得出的结论是,后共产主义政府的旗舰亲生育主义激励措施、家庭政策和传统主义言论在扭转人口下降或重新传统化当代妇女生活方面的作用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信