Clinical practice pattern of managing low back pain among physiotherapists in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
Mohammad Ali, Z. Uddin, A. Hossain
{"title":"Clinical practice pattern of managing low back pain among physiotherapists in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Mohammad Ali, Z. Uddin, A. Hossain","doi":"10.3233/ppr-210549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is the top global cause of disability, and physiotherapy interventions are used to manage it. However, understanding of the practice pattern of physiotherapists dealing with LBP patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. This study aimed to explore the LBP practice pattern of LMIC’s (i. e., Bangladesh) physiotherapists by their demographic and professional factors. METHODS: This cross-sectional study sent a survey to randomly selected physiotherapists via email. RESULTS: Data of 423 illegible physiotherapist were analyzed. The majority of the physiotherapists (54.8%) were nongovernment service holders, and 87.7% worked in an urban setting. Recommended interventions were frequently used by only 12.3%, occasionally used by 66.2%, and 21.5% did not offer those interventions. Partially recommended interventions were frequently used by 33.3%, occasionally used by 43.7%, and never used by 23% of physiotherapists. For not recommended interventions, 69.3% occasionally, 13.5% frequently, and 17.3% never used such interventions. CONCLUSION: The study explored the practice pattern of physiotherapists of an LMIC by comparing available evidence-based practice guidelines for LBP. The findings of this study may provide an LMIC database to inform future research, clinical practice and education to ensure adherence to evidence-based LBP physiotherapy management.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-210549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is the top global cause of disability, and physiotherapy interventions are used to manage it. However, understanding of the practice pattern of physiotherapists dealing with LBP patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. This study aimed to explore the LBP practice pattern of LMIC’s (i. e., Bangladesh) physiotherapists by their demographic and professional factors. METHODS: This cross-sectional study sent a survey to randomly selected physiotherapists via email. RESULTS: Data of 423 illegible physiotherapist were analyzed. The majority of the physiotherapists (54.8%) were nongovernment service holders, and 87.7% worked in an urban setting. Recommended interventions were frequently used by only 12.3%, occasionally used by 66.2%, and 21.5% did not offer those interventions. Partially recommended interventions were frequently used by 33.3%, occasionally used by 43.7%, and never used by 23% of physiotherapists. For not recommended interventions, 69.3% occasionally, 13.5% frequently, and 17.3% never used such interventions. CONCLUSION: The study explored the practice pattern of physiotherapists of an LMIC by comparing available evidence-based practice guidelines for LBP. The findings of this study may provide an LMIC database to inform future research, clinical practice and education to ensure adherence to evidence-based LBP physiotherapy management.
孟加拉国物理治疗师治疗腰痛的临床实践模式:一项横断面研究
简介:腰痛(LBP)是全球致残的首要原因,物理治疗干预被用于管理它。然而,在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)物理治疗师处理腰痛患者的实践模式的理解是有限的。本研究旨在探讨LMIC(即孟加拉国)物理治疗师的人口统计学和专业因素对LBP实践模式的影响。方法:本横断面研究通过电子邮件向随机选择的物理治疗师发送调查。结果:对423名难以辨认的物理治疗师的资料进行分析。大多数物理治疗师(54.8%)为非政府服务人员,87.7%在城市工作。只有12.3%的人经常使用推荐的干预措施,66.2%的人偶尔使用,21.5%的人没有提供这些干预措施。33.3%的物理治疗师经常使用部分推荐的干预措施,43.7%偶尔使用,23%的物理治疗师从不使用。对于不推荐的干预措施,69.3%偶尔使用,13.5%经常使用,17.3%从未使用。结论:该研究通过比较现有的基于证据的LBP实践指南,探讨了LMIC物理治疗师的实践模式。本研究的发现可能提供LMIC数据库,为未来的研究、临床实践和教育提供信息,以确保坚持循证LBP物理治疗管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信