Doing Housework in Context: Dyadic Analyses of the Division of Domestic Labor in Contemporary Couples

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Natascha Nisic, Miriam Trübner
{"title":"Doing Housework in Context: Dyadic Analyses of the Division of Domestic Labor in Contemporary Couples","authors":"Natascha Nisic, Miriam Trübner","doi":"10.1177/0192513x231172285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The persisting gendered division of domestic labor in Western societies remains puzzling. Beyond standard economic and normative explanations, more recent approaches emphasize affective, cognitive, and incorporated aspects of housework and the production, reproduction, and negotiation of gendered expectations via social interactions. However, the relevant indicators for these more implicit mechanisms are not routinely included in social surveys. Based on a unique set of items and a representative sample of heterosexual couples ( N = 1396) from pairfam (wave 10), we analyze the mutual effects of both partners’ enjoyment, quality standards, and reciprocally perceived competencies on the division of housework. Actor–partner interdependence models (APIM) are applied, which explicitly model the partner dyad. Both an actor’s own and their partner’s assessments of competences and preferences—and particularly men’s attributes and perceptions—prove to be powerful predictors of housework share. The results contribute quantitative evidence on processes of doing and undoing gender in context.","PeriodicalId":48283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x231172285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The persisting gendered division of domestic labor in Western societies remains puzzling. Beyond standard economic and normative explanations, more recent approaches emphasize affective, cognitive, and incorporated aspects of housework and the production, reproduction, and negotiation of gendered expectations via social interactions. However, the relevant indicators for these more implicit mechanisms are not routinely included in social surveys. Based on a unique set of items and a representative sample of heterosexual couples ( N = 1396) from pairfam (wave 10), we analyze the mutual effects of both partners’ enjoyment, quality standards, and reciprocally perceived competencies on the division of housework. Actor–partner interdependence models (APIM) are applied, which explicitly model the partner dyad. Both an actor’s own and their partner’s assessments of competences and preferences—and particularly men’s attributes and perceptions—prove to be powerful predictors of housework share. The results contribute quantitative evidence on processes of doing and undoing gender in context.
语境中的家务劳动:当代夫妻家务分工的二元分析
西方社会持续存在的家务劳动性别分工仍然令人困惑。除了标准的经济和规范解释之外,最近的方法强调家务劳动的情感、认知和整合方面,以及通过社会互动产生、再生产和性别期望的协商。然而,这些更为含蓄的机制的相关指标通常不包括在社会调查中。基于一组独特的项目和异性恋夫妇(N = 1396)的代表性样本(波10),我们分析了伴侣双方的享受,质量标准和相互感知的能力对家务分工的相互影响。应用了参与者-合作伙伴相互依赖模型(APIM),它显式地对合作伙伴二元模型进行建模。事实证明,演员自己和伴侣对能力和偏好的评估——尤其是男性的特质和感知——都是家务分担的有力预测因素。结果提供定量证据的过程做和取消性别在上下文中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Family Issues
Journal of Family Issues FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The journal is devoted to contemporary social issues and social problems related to marriage and family life and to theoretical and professional issues of current interest to those who work with and study families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信