Trends in James Baldwin Criticism 2010–13

Q1 Arts and Humanities
D. Q. Miller
{"title":"Trends in James Baldwin Criticism 2010–13","authors":"D. Q. Miller","doi":"10.7227/JBR.3.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The acceleration of interest in Baldwin’s work and impact since 2010 shows no signs of diminishing. This resurgence has much to do with Baldwin—the richness and passionate intensity of his vision—and also something to do with the dedicated scholars who have pursued a variety of publication platforms to generate further interest in his work. The reach of Baldwin studies has grown outside the academy as well: Black Lives Matter demonstrations routinely feature quotations from Baldwin; Twitter includes a “Son of Baldwin” site; and Raoul Peck’s 2016 documentary, I Am Not Your Negro , has received considerable critical and popular interest. The years 2010–13 were a key period in moving past the tired old formula—that praised his early career and denigrated the works he wrote after 1963—into the new formula—positing Baldwin as a misunderstood visionary, a wide-reaching artist, and a social critic whose value we are only now beginning to appreciate. I would highlight four additional prominent trends that emerged between 2010 and 2013: a consideration of Baldwin in the contexts of film, drama, and music; understandings of Baldwin globally; Baldwin’s criticism of American institutions; and analyses of Baldwin’s work in conversation with other authors.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"186-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/JBR.3.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The acceleration of interest in Baldwin’s work and impact since 2010 shows no signs of diminishing. This resurgence has much to do with Baldwin—the richness and passionate intensity of his vision—and also something to do with the dedicated scholars who have pursued a variety of publication platforms to generate further interest in his work. The reach of Baldwin studies has grown outside the academy as well: Black Lives Matter demonstrations routinely feature quotations from Baldwin; Twitter includes a “Son of Baldwin” site; and Raoul Peck’s 2016 documentary, I Am Not Your Negro , has received considerable critical and popular interest. The years 2010–13 were a key period in moving past the tired old formula—that praised his early career and denigrated the works he wrote after 1963—into the new formula—positing Baldwin as a misunderstood visionary, a wide-reaching artist, and a social critic whose value we are only now beginning to appreciate. I would highlight four additional prominent trends that emerged between 2010 and 2013: a consideration of Baldwin in the contexts of film, drama, and music; understandings of Baldwin globally; Baldwin’s criticism of American institutions; and analyses of Baldwin’s work in conversation with other authors.
詹姆斯·鲍德温评论趋势2010-13
自2010年以来,人们对鲍德温作品的兴趣和影响力的加速没有减弱的迹象。这种复兴与鲍德温——他的愿景的丰富性和激情的强度——有很大关系,也与那些致力于追求各种出版平台以进一步激发人们对他的作品兴趣的学者有关。鲍德温研究的范围也在学院外扩大:“黑人的命也是命”的示威活动经常引用鲍德温的话;推特上有一个“鲍德温之子”网站;拉乌尔·佩克2016年的纪录片《我不是你的黑人》受到了相当多的评论和大众的关注。2010-2013年是一个关键时期,从旧的模式转变为新的模式,旧的模式赞扬了鲍德温早期的职业生涯,诋毁了他1963年后创作的作品。新的模式将鲍德温定位为一个被误解的梦想家、一个影响广泛的艺术家和一个社会评论家,我们现在才开始欣赏他的价值。我想强调2010年至2013年间出现的另外四个突出趋势:在电影、戏剧和音乐的背景下考虑鲍德温;全球对鲍德温的理解;鲍德温对美国制度的批评;以及在与其他作者的对话中对鲍德温作品的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
James Baldwin Review
James Baldwin Review Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信