{"title":"David Bilchitz’s ‘Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business’","authors":"Selwyn Coles","doi":"10.1080/1323238X.2022.2124503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It is now widely acknowledged that corporations significantly impact the fundamental rights of individuals; and so they should carry (negative, and possibly also positive) obligations with respect to those fundamental rights. Yet the literature has largely neglected the critical follow-up question: how do we determine the content of those obligations in particular situations? Bilchitz takes up that challenge in his magisterial new work, Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business, which is the subject of this review essay. His key contribution is providing a structured process of reasoning to guide decision-makers in concrete contexts. This reasoning process involves the identification of various normative factors to guide the determination of corporate obligations which then must be balanced according to two structured tests for positive and negative obligations respectively. This paper summarises Bilchitz’s core arguments in some detail, attempts to distil the ‘heart’ of his strategic project, and then concludes by raising several critical points for discussion.","PeriodicalId":37430,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Human Rights","volume":"28 1","pages":"163 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2022.2124503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT It is now widely acknowledged that corporations significantly impact the fundamental rights of individuals; and so they should carry (negative, and possibly also positive) obligations with respect to those fundamental rights. Yet the literature has largely neglected the critical follow-up question: how do we determine the content of those obligations in particular situations? Bilchitz takes up that challenge in his magisterial new work, Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business, which is the subject of this review essay. His key contribution is providing a structured process of reasoning to guide decision-makers in concrete contexts. This reasoning process involves the identification of various normative factors to guide the determination of corporate obligations which then must be balanced according to two structured tests for positive and negative obligations respectively. This paper summarises Bilchitz’s core arguments in some detail, attempts to distil the ‘heart’ of his strategic project, and then concludes by raising several critical points for discussion.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Human Rights (AJHR) is Australia’s first peer reviewed journal devoted exclusively to human rights development in Australia, the Asia-Pacific region and internationally. The journal aims to raise awareness of human rights issues in Australia and the Asia-Pacific region by providing a forum for scholarship and discussion. The AJHR examines legal aspects of human rights, along with associated philosophical, historical, economic and political considerations, across a range of issues, including aboriginal ownership of land, racial discrimination and vilification, human rights in the criminal justice system, children’s rights, homelessness, immigration, asylum and detention, corporate accountability, disability standards and free speech.