Neurologic Complications of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Neonates and Infants

M. Schmaedick, Devin Midura, Claire Gerall, D. Garey, W. Middlesworth, J. Bain
{"title":"Neurologic Complications of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Neonates and Infants","authors":"M. Schmaedick, Devin Midura, Claire Gerall, D. Garey, W. Middlesworth, J. Bain","doi":"10.1177/2329048X221114970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a lifesaving measure for patients in cardiac or respiratory failure. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is emergent ECMO cannulation during cardiac arrest. All ECMO patients are at high risk for neurologic complications, but the degree of risk of ECPR relative to ECMO without CPR in progress (non-ECPR ECMO) is not well documented in infants. The goal of the present study is to compare neurologic complication rates between infants who underwent ECPR and those who underwent non-ECPR ECMO. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review on all patients admitted between 2009 and 2020 to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in our quaternary children's hospital. We separated patients by ECPR vs. non-ECPR ECMO cannulation. We compared rates of death and used neuroimaging and video electroencephalogram (vEEG) to determine incidence of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and seizure. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare these categorical variables among groups.Results: A total of 181 infants were cannulated onto ECMO. Of these, 40 received ECPR, 56 received non-ECPR ECMO for a cardiac indication, and 85 received non-ECPR ECMO for a respiratory indication. After excluding patients currently admitted (n=1, ECPR), 180 patients were subjected to analysis. ECPR patients were less likely to survive to hospital discharge than patients who underwent non-ECPR ECMO for respiratory indications, and less likely to survive without any neurologic complication compared with infants who underwent non-ECPR ECMO for cardiac or respiratory indications. Interpretation: Significantly fewer ECPR patients survived without experiencing a neurologic complication, compared with non-ECPR ECMO patients.","PeriodicalId":72572,"journal":{"name":"Child neurology open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child neurology open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2329048X221114970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a lifesaving measure for patients in cardiac or respiratory failure. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is emergent ECMO cannulation during cardiac arrest. All ECMO patients are at high risk for neurologic complications, but the degree of risk of ECPR relative to ECMO without CPR in progress (non-ECPR ECMO) is not well documented in infants. The goal of the present study is to compare neurologic complication rates between infants who underwent ECPR and those who underwent non-ECPR ECMO. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review on all patients admitted between 2009 and 2020 to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in our quaternary children's hospital. We separated patients by ECPR vs. non-ECPR ECMO cannulation. We compared rates of death and used neuroimaging and video electroencephalogram (vEEG) to determine incidence of stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and seizure. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare these categorical variables among groups.Results: A total of 181 infants were cannulated onto ECMO. Of these, 40 received ECPR, 56 received non-ECPR ECMO for a cardiac indication, and 85 received non-ECPR ECMO for a respiratory indication. After excluding patients currently admitted (n=1, ECPR), 180 patients were subjected to analysis. ECPR patients were less likely to survive to hospital discharge than patients who underwent non-ECPR ECMO for respiratory indications, and less likely to survive without any neurologic complication compared with infants who underwent non-ECPR ECMO for cardiac or respiratory indications. Interpretation: Significantly fewer ECPR patients survived without experiencing a neurologic complication, compared with non-ECPR ECMO patients.
新生儿和婴儿体外心肺复苏的神经系统并发症
目的:体外膜氧合(Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO)是抢救心力衰竭或呼吸衰竭患者生命的重要手段。体外心肺复苏(ECPR)是在心脏骤停期间紧急ECMO插管。所有ECMO患者都有神经系统并发症的高风险,但在婴儿中,ECPR相对于未进行心肺复苏术的ECMO(非ECPR ECMO)的风险程度并没有很好的文献记载。本研究的目的是比较接受ECPR和非ECPR的婴儿ECMO的神经并发症发生率。方法:我们对2009年至2020年在我院第四儿科医院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)住院的所有患者进行回顾性图表回顾。我们通过ECPR与非ECPR ECMO插管将患者分开。我们比较了死亡率,并使用神经影像学和视频脑电图(vEEG)来确定中风、颅内出血和癫痫发作的发生率。使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验来比较组间这些分类变量。结果:181例患儿插管至ECMO。其中,40人接受ECPR, 56人因心脏指征接受非ECPR ECMO, 85人因呼吸指征接受非ECPR ECMO。在排除目前入院的患者(n=1, ECPR)后,180例患者进行分析。与因呼吸适应证而接受非ECPR ECMO的患者相比,ECPR患者存活至出院的可能性更小,与因心脏或呼吸适应证而接受非ECPR ECMO的婴儿相比,无任何神经系统并发症的存活可能性更小。解释:与非ECPR的ECMO患者相比,ECPR患者在没有神经系统并发症的情况下存活的人数明显减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信