Reverse retirement — a mixed methods study of returning to work in England, Italy and the United States: propensities, predictors and preferences

Q1 Social Sciences
D. Smeaton, M. D. Rosa, A. Principi, Zoe Butler
{"title":"Reverse retirement — a mixed methods study of returning to work in England, Italy and the United States: propensities, predictors and preferences","authors":"D. Smeaton, M. D. Rosa, A. Principi, Zoe Butler","doi":"10.3384/IJAL.1652-8670.17360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using methodological triangulation the study examines reverse retirement in Italy, the United States and England to explore the salience of cultural and structural factors and to consider the extent to which returning to work is a constrained choice. Analysis of harmonised panel data (HRS, ELSA and SHARE) indicates that reverse retirement is most common in the United States and extremely rare in Italy. In the liberal economies of the United States and England, financial factors are key determinants, including retirement income, having more children, children under 30 and mortgage debt. However, a certain degree of advantage is a prerequisite for returning to work, including higher education, good health, younger age, and free from caring responsibilities – opportunity structures and capacity to work therefore remain barriers for some older groups. Despite international convergence in the policy landscape, “retirement” continues to hold different meanings in the three distinct national contexts with implications for later life working.","PeriodicalId":39906,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ageing and Later Life","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ageing and Later Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/IJAL.1652-8670.17360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Using methodological triangulation the study examines reverse retirement in Italy, the United States and England to explore the salience of cultural and structural factors and to consider the extent to which returning to work is a constrained choice. Analysis of harmonised panel data (HRS, ELSA and SHARE) indicates that reverse retirement is most common in the United States and extremely rare in Italy. In the liberal economies of the United States and England, financial factors are key determinants, including retirement income, having more children, children under 30 and mortgage debt. However, a certain degree of advantage is a prerequisite for returning to work, including higher education, good health, younger age, and free from caring responsibilities – opportunity structures and capacity to work therefore remain barriers for some older groups. Despite international convergence in the policy landscape, “retirement” continues to hold different meanings in the three distinct national contexts with implications for later life working.
逆向退休——一项对英国、意大利和美国重返工作岗位的混合方法研究:倾向、预测因素和偏好
本研究采用三角测量方法,对意大利、美国和英国的逆向退休进行了调查,以探索文化和结构因素的显著性,并考虑重返工作岗位在多大程度上是一种受限的选择。对协调面板数据(HRS, ELSA和SHARE)的分析表明,反向退休在美国最常见,在意大利极为罕见。在美国和英国的自由经济中,金融因素是关键的决定因素,包括退休收入、生育更多的孩子、30岁以下的孩子和抵押贷款债务。然而,一定程度的优势是重返工作岗位的先决条件,包括受过高等教育、身体健康、年龄较轻、没有照顾他人的责任——因此,机会结构和工作能力仍然是一些老年群体的障碍。尽管国际上的政策格局趋同,但“退休”在三个不同的国家背景下仍然具有不同的含义,并对以后的生活工作产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Ageing and Later Life
International Journal of Ageing and Later Life Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Ageing and Later Life (IJAL) serves an audience interested in social and cultural aspects of ageing and later life development. As such, the Journal welcomes contributions that aim at advancing the theoretical and conceptual debate on research on ageing and later life. Contributions based on empirical work are also welcome as are methodologically interested discussions of relevance to the study of ageing and later life. Being an international journal, IJAL acknowledges the need to understand the cultural diversity and context dependency of ageing and later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信