Evaluation of the Anisotropic Analytical dose calculation Algorithm in heterogeneous medium using in vivo dosimetry for high energy photon beams

Q3 Health Professions
Y. Berkani, R. Khelifi
{"title":"Evaluation of the Anisotropic Analytical dose calculation Algorithm in heterogeneous medium using in vivo dosimetry for high energy photon beams","authors":"Y. Berkani, R. Khelifi","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2020.46457.1739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This work was aimed to determine the dose at any depth in heterogeneous medium using diodes to evaluate a dose calculation algorithm. Usually the calibration is limited at the depth of the maximum of energy. The particularity of this work was based on the determination of calibration curves.Material and methods: Measurements at three depths (4cm, 8cm and 12cm) were made by ten QEDTM diodes from Sun Nuclear on heterogeneous phantoms composed of PMMA and expanded polystyrene roughly simulating the rib cage. These phantoms were irradiated under 6MV and 18MV photon beams from a Varian linear accelerator (2100C) by plans calculated from the treatment planning system (TPS) Eclipse equipped with the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) V13.6.The calibration curves were carried out by considering several measurement points in depth by a graphite ionization chamber in a heterogeneous medium composed of expanded polystyrene slabs and PMMA plates. The diode calibration factor is taken from these curves by interpolation.The measured and calculated data were compared to evaluate the AAA.Results: Ninety measurements were performed on three types of heterogeneous phantoms. Depending on the depth of the measurements, the deviations obtained between the measurement and the calculation predicted by the TPS remained less than 2%. Some were in the order of magnitude around 3%.An average of 1.13% is obtained over all the measurements with an average deviation of 0.66% and a standard deviation of 0.80%. The upper limit of the confidence interval is 1.41% for a confidence level of 99.9%.Conclusion: The deviations obtained remain within the standards recommended for the validation of a dose calculation algorithm in a heterogeneous medium.The calibration method based on the dose profiles allowed the completion of the knowledge of the dose in a heterogeneous medium based on a single reading of the diode.","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2020.46457.1739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This work was aimed to determine the dose at any depth in heterogeneous medium using diodes to evaluate a dose calculation algorithm. Usually the calibration is limited at the depth of the maximum of energy. The particularity of this work was based on the determination of calibration curves.Material and methods: Measurements at three depths (4cm, 8cm and 12cm) were made by ten QEDTM diodes from Sun Nuclear on heterogeneous phantoms composed of PMMA and expanded polystyrene roughly simulating the rib cage. These phantoms were irradiated under 6MV and 18MV photon beams from a Varian linear accelerator (2100C) by plans calculated from the treatment planning system (TPS) Eclipse equipped with the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) V13.6.The calibration curves were carried out by considering several measurement points in depth by a graphite ionization chamber in a heterogeneous medium composed of expanded polystyrene slabs and PMMA plates. The diode calibration factor is taken from these curves by interpolation.The measured and calculated data were compared to evaluate the AAA.Results: Ninety measurements were performed on three types of heterogeneous phantoms. Depending on the depth of the measurements, the deviations obtained between the measurement and the calculation predicted by the TPS remained less than 2%. Some were in the order of magnitude around 3%.An average of 1.13% is obtained over all the measurements with an average deviation of 0.66% and a standard deviation of 0.80%. The upper limit of the confidence interval is 1.41% for a confidence level of 99.9%.Conclusion: The deviations obtained remain within the standards recommended for the validation of a dose calculation algorithm in a heterogeneous medium.The calibration method based on the dose profiles allowed the completion of the knowledge of the dose in a heterogeneous medium based on a single reading of the diode.
异质介质中高能光子光束体内剂量学各向异性分析剂量计算算法的评价
引言:这项工作旨在使用二极管来评估剂量计算算法,从而确定异质介质中任何深度的剂量。通常,校准被限制在能量最大值的深度。这项工作的特殊性是基于校准曲线的确定。材料和方法:由Sun Nuclear的10个QEDTM二极管在大致模拟胸腔的由PMMA和发泡聚苯乙烯组成的异质体模上进行了三个深度(4cm、8cm和12cm)的测量。根据配备各向异性分析算法(AAA)V13.6的治疗计划系统(TPS)Eclipse计算的计划,在Varian线性加速器(2100C)的6MV和18MV光子束下照射这些模型。通过考虑石墨电离室在由发泡聚苯乙烯板和PMMA板。二极管校准因子是通过插值从这些曲线中获得的。将测量数据和计算数据进行比较,以评估AAA。结果:对三种类型的异质体模进行了90次测量。根据测量的深度,在测量和TPS预测的计算之间获得的偏差保持小于2%。一些在3%左右的数量级。在所有测量中获得的平均值为1.13%,平均偏差为0.66%,标准偏差为0.80%。置信区间的上限为1.41%,置信水平为99.9%。结论:获得的偏差仍在非均质介质。基于剂量分布的校准方法允许基于二极管的单个读数完成异质介质中的剂量知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信