How do elite sport organizations frame diversity and inclusion? A critical race analysis

IF 3.7 1区 教育学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Ashley Gardner, Adam Love, Steven Waller
{"title":"How do elite sport organizations frame diversity and inclusion? A critical race analysis","authors":"Ashley Gardner, Adam Love, Steven Waller","doi":"10.1080/14413523.2022.2062975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sport organizations frequently present themselves as committed to diversity and inclusion by creating an array of policies, programs and other initiatives. However, this image of diversity and inclusion is often not reflected in actual organizational practices, as leadership positions remain largely dominated by White men. To investigate the ways in which elite sport organizations frame diversity and inclusion, the current study analyzed documents produced by the National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball, National Football League and the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee. Using principles of critical race theory as a framework, the findings illustrate ways in which these organizations frame diversity generally and racial diversity specifically. While each organization publicized numerous policies, programs, events and other initiatives ostensibly intended to promote diversity and inclusion, the terms “racism” or “sexism” did not appear once in their materials. Ultimately, if organizations fail to recognize and address the structural causes of inequality, any initiatives they promote are unlikely to foster meaningful progress with respect to social justice. HIGHLIGHTS Sport organizations use a variety of policies, programs and other initiatives to demonstrate their commitment to diversity and inclusion. The actions of sport organizations often fail to align with the commitment to diversity expressed in their policies and statements. An examination of documents from elite sport organizations indicated they frame diversity in a way that obscures structural forces, such as racism and sexism. If organizations fail to address the structural causes of inequality, any initiatives they promote are unlikely to foster meaningful progress with respect to diversity.","PeriodicalId":48057,"journal":{"name":"Sport Management Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"339 - 360"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2022.2062975","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sport organizations frequently present themselves as committed to diversity and inclusion by creating an array of policies, programs and other initiatives. However, this image of diversity and inclusion is often not reflected in actual organizational practices, as leadership positions remain largely dominated by White men. To investigate the ways in which elite sport organizations frame diversity and inclusion, the current study analyzed documents produced by the National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball, National Football League and the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee. Using principles of critical race theory as a framework, the findings illustrate ways in which these organizations frame diversity generally and racial diversity specifically. While each organization publicized numerous policies, programs, events and other initiatives ostensibly intended to promote diversity and inclusion, the terms “racism” or “sexism” did not appear once in their materials. Ultimately, if organizations fail to recognize and address the structural causes of inequality, any initiatives they promote are unlikely to foster meaningful progress with respect to social justice. HIGHLIGHTS Sport organizations use a variety of policies, programs and other initiatives to demonstrate their commitment to diversity and inclusion. The actions of sport organizations often fail to align with the commitment to diversity expressed in their policies and statements. An examination of documents from elite sport organizations indicated they frame diversity in a way that obscures structural forces, such as racism and sexism. If organizations fail to address the structural causes of inequality, any initiatives they promote are unlikely to foster meaningful progress with respect to diversity.
精英体育组织如何构建多样性和包容性?批判性种族分析
体育组织经常通过制定一系列政策、项目和其他举措来展示自己致力于多样性和包容性。然而,这种多样性和包容性的形象往往没有反映在实际的组织实践中,因为领导职位仍然主要由白人男性主导。为了调查精英体育组织如何构建多样性和包容性,目前的研究分析了美国国家篮球协会(National Basketball Association)、美国职业棒球大联盟(Major League Baseball)、美国国家橄榄球联盟(National Football League)以及美国奥林匹克和残疾人奥林匹克委员会(United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee)提供的文件。使用批判种族理论的原则作为框架,研究结果说明了这些组织在总体上和具体的种族多样性框架的方式。虽然每个组织都公布了许多表面上旨在促进多样性和包容性的政策、项目、活动和其他倡议,但“种族主义”或“性别歧视”一词却一次也没有出现在他们的材料中。最终,如果组织不能认识和解决不平等的结构性原因,它们所推动的任何倡议都不太可能在社会正义方面促进有意义的进展。体育组织使用各种政策、项目和其他举措来展示他们对多样性和包容性的承诺。体育组织的行动往往不符合其政策和声明中所表达的对多样性的承诺。对精英体育组织文件的研究表明,他们以一种模糊种族主义和性别歧视等结构性力量的方式构建了多样性。如果组织不能解决不平等的结构性原因,他们所推动的任何举措都不太可能在多样性方面促进有意义的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Sport Management Review is published as a service to sport industries worldwide. It is a multidisciplinary journal concerned with the management, marketing, and governance of sport at all levels and in all its manifestations -- whether as an entertainment, a recreation, or an occupation. The journal encourages collaboration between scholars and practitioners. It welcomes submissions reporting research, new applications, advances in theory, and case studies. The language of publication is English. Submissions are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信