Factors Differentiating Poles’ Attitudes Towards Social Relations – a Spatial Approach

T. Szubert
{"title":"Factors Differentiating Poles’ Attitudes Towards Social Relations – a Spatial Approach","authors":"T. Szubert","doi":"10.18778/0208-6018.341.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research focuses on Poles’ attitudes towards selected aspects associated with social relations. Responses to the following 6 statements were examined: 1 – People try to help others above all, 2 – Homosexuals should be allowed to live according to their beliefs, 3 – Foreigners have too much to say in our country, 4 – Some people are worth more than others, 5 – Some groups of persons are not worthy of respect, 6 – We should seek to make the income of all persons more or less equal. The first aim of the study was to check how the level of agreement with those statements was distributed spatially in terms of districts. Then it was checked whether those attitudes were differentiated by 8 characteristics describing Poles: sex, marital status, education level, health status, participation in church services, age and income level, also taking into account the spatial aspect. Finally, regression models (classical and spatial) were constructed to check whether several features describing districts (rather than individual respondents) could help to build a model explaining why in some regions the population agreed with the statements more and in other areas less. The data needed for the analysis were taken from the nationwide study entitled “Social Diagnosis” and all calculations were carried out in the PQStat and Geoda programmes.","PeriodicalId":32170,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.341.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research focuses on Poles’ attitudes towards selected aspects associated with social relations. Responses to the following 6 statements were examined: 1 – People try to help others above all, 2 – Homosexuals should be allowed to live according to their beliefs, 3 – Foreigners have too much to say in our country, 4 – Some people are worth more than others, 5 – Some groups of persons are not worthy of respect, 6 – We should seek to make the income of all persons more or less equal. The first aim of the study was to check how the level of agreement with those statements was distributed spatially in terms of districts. Then it was checked whether those attitudes were differentiated by 8 characteristics describing Poles: sex, marital status, education level, health status, participation in church services, age and income level, also taking into account the spatial aspect. Finally, regression models (classical and spatial) were constructed to check whether several features describing districts (rather than individual respondents) could help to build a model explaining why in some regions the population agreed with the statements more and in other areas less. The data needed for the analysis were taken from the nationwide study entitled “Social Diagnosis” and all calculations were carried out in the PQStat and Geoda programmes.
两极对社会关系态度的差异因素——一个空间视角
研究的重点是波兰人对与社会关系相关的某些方面的态度。对以下6条陈述的回答进行了审查:1 -人们首先要帮助别人,2 -同性恋者应该被允许按照他们的信仰生活,3 -外国人在我们国家有太多的发言权,4 -有些人比其他人更有价值,5 -一些群体不值得尊重,6 -我们应该寻求使所有人的收入或多或少平等。这项研究的第一个目的是检查对这些陈述的同意程度如何在地区的空间分布。然后检查这些态度是否通过描述波兰人的8个特征来区分:性别、婚姻状况、教育水平、健康状况、参加教会服务、年龄和收入水平,并考虑到空间方面。最后,构建回归模型(经典模型和空间模型)来检验描述地区(而不是个体受访者)的几个特征是否有助于建立一个模型,解释为什么在某些地区,人口更同意这些陈述,而在其他地区,人口更不同意这些陈述。分析所需的数据来自一项名为“社会诊断”的全国性研究,所有的计算都在PQStat和Geoda项目中进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书