The Pluralist Constitution

IF 0.4 3区社会学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Critical Review Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/08913811.2020.1893498

Sonu Bedi

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Because of the irresolvable disagreement between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, the U.S. Constitution both embodies value pluralism and has encouraged it ever since its adoption. Rather than ignoring the nation-centered, dynamic ideas of the Federalists or the state-centered, static ideas of the Anti-Federalists, the Constitution incorporated both views, giving rise to plentiful opportunities for interpretive disagreements that have not, however, stood in the way of the interpreters’ shared commitment to the document itself. In this respect, the Constitution and constitutional law model the politics of pluralism.

查看原文本刊更多论文

多元宪法

摘要由于联邦党人和反联邦党人之间无法解决的分歧，美国宪法自通过以来既体现了价值多元化，又鼓励了价值多元化。《宪法》没有忽视联邦党人以国家为中心的动态思想，也没有忽视反联邦党人的以州为中心的静态思想，而是融合了这两种观点，为解释分歧提供了大量机会，然而，这些分歧并没有妨碍口译员对文件本身的共同承诺。在这方面，《宪法》和宪法法律是多元主义政治的典范。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society is a political-science journal dedicated to advancing political theory with an epistemological bent. Recurrent questions discussed in our pages include: How can political actors know what they need to know to effect positive social change? What are the sources of political actors’ beliefs? Are these sources reliable? Critical Review is the only journal in which the ideational determinants of political behavior are investigated empirically as well as being assessed for their normative implications. Thus, while normative political theorists are the main contributors to Critical Review, we also publish scholarship on the realities of public opinion, the media, technocratic decision making, ideological reasoning, and other empirical phenomena.