La «Scienza della logica» di Hegel: autonomia come emancipazione del pensiero

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
G. L. Rocca
{"title":"La «Scienza della logica» di Hegel: autonomia come emancipazione del pensiero","authors":"G. L. Rocca","doi":"10.13130/2240-9599/12071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the Science of Logic , Hegel poses a radical challenge to philosophy: a self-presentation of thought that, by not assuming anything outside itself, achieves its self-knowledge. From the possibility of such a project depends that of the autonomy of thought, that is, of a thought that gives itself its own law. Some classical readings consider this enterprise to be unsuccesful or not to be fully accomplished in the Logic . According to Dieter Henrich, Hegel's Logic would fall into a circle, because (although without external assumption) would be burdened by the presupposition of the structure of thought itself, which should rather result from the logical process. For Robert B. Pippin or Terry Pinkard, instead, the instance of autonomy of thought would be realized not in the logic, but only at the level of the spirit. In contrast to such interpretations, we will try to show that precisely in the Logic the thought determines itself as autonomous. In its self-presentation thought, that has itself as its object, produces its own structures, which are not prior to the movement (it produces its own form or law). And once it has come to know itself as such a process, thought ceases to presuppose itself as an object (it emancipates itself) and poses its own form for itself (it gives itself the law).","PeriodicalId":53793,"journal":{"name":"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lebenswelt-Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13130/2240-9599/12071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the Science of Logic , Hegel poses a radical challenge to philosophy: a self-presentation of thought that, by not assuming anything outside itself, achieves its self-knowledge. From the possibility of such a project depends that of the autonomy of thought, that is, of a thought that gives itself its own law. Some classical readings consider this enterprise to be unsuccesful or not to be fully accomplished in the Logic . According to Dieter Henrich, Hegel's Logic would fall into a circle, because (although without external assumption) would be burdened by the presupposition of the structure of thought itself, which should rather result from the logical process. For Robert B. Pippin or Terry Pinkard, instead, the instance of autonomy of thought would be realized not in the logic, but only at the level of the spirit. In contrast to such interpretations, we will try to show that precisely in the Logic the thought determines itself as autonomous. In its self-presentation thought, that has itself as its object, produces its own structures, which are not prior to the movement (it produces its own form or law). And once it has come to know itself as such a process, thought ceases to presuppose itself as an object (it emancipates itself) and poses its own form for itself (it gives itself the law).
黑格尔的“逻辑科学”:作为思想解放的自主性
通过《逻辑科学》,黑格尔对哲学提出了一个根本性的挑战:思想的自我呈现,通过不假设自己之外的任何东西,实现了自我认识。这样一个项目的可能性取决于思想的自主性,也就是说,一种赋予自己法律的思想。一些经典读物认为这项事业是不成功的,或者在逻辑学中没有完全完成。根据Dieter Henrich的观点,黑格尔的逻辑会陷入一个循环,因为(尽管没有外部假设)会受到思想结构本身的预设的负担,而思想结构本身应该是逻辑过程的结果。相反,对于罗伯特·B·皮聘或特里·平卡德来说,思想自主的例子不会在逻辑上实现,而只能在精神层面实现。与这种解释相反,我们将试图证明,正是在逻辑学中,思想决定了自己是自主的。在其自我呈现的思想中,以自身为对象,产生了自己的结构,而这些结构并不先于运动(它产生了自身的形式或规律)。一旦它认识到自己是这样一个过程,思想就不再把自己预设为一个对象(它解放了自己),并为自己提出了自己的形式(它赋予自己法律)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信