Positive Behavior Supports in Exclusionary Schools: A Practical Approach Based on What We Know.

Joseph Calvin Gagnon, Sarah B. Rockwell, Terrance M. Scott
{"title":"Positive Behavior Supports in Exclusionary Schools: A Practical Approach Based on What We Know.","authors":"Joseph Calvin Gagnon, Sarah B. Rockwell, Terrance M. Scott","doi":"10.17161/FOEC.V41I1.6834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy makers, community members, parents, and school administrators all recognize that the safety of our public schools is of the utmost importance (Barnoski, 2001; Snell, 2005). Highly publicized incidents of shootings at our nation’s schools have raised public awareness of the need for safe schools and led to an outcry for reform (Leone, Mayer, Malmgren, & Meisel, 2000). Although incidents of extreme violence at schools should not be ignored, they do not accurately represent the degree of safety in U.S. schools. In reality, incidents of violence at schools have steadily decreased over the past 15 years, few schools are considered to be persistently dangerous under federal guidelines, and for many students schools are significantly safer than the neighborhoods in which they live (Snell; Leone et al.). Despite the increasing safety of public schools, disruptive behavior and school violence are still pressing issues. The Juvenile Offenders and Victims: National Report (Snyder & Sickmund, 2006) describes continuing concerns with violence in schools. For instance, alarming percentages of students reported carrying weapons (6.1%) or threatened with a weapon (9.2%) at school. Less severe forms of school violence are also problematic. For example, in a survey conducted in Washington State, 78% of elementary school teachers, 81% of middle school teachers, and 66% of high school teachers indicated that decreasing disruptive behavior was one of the top three priorities at their schools (Barnoski, 2001). Moreover, disruptive behaviors were cited as having a significantly negative impact on students’ ability to learn. Low-severity violent behaviors may include classroom disruptions, noncompliance, teasing and bullying, theft, property damage, and fighting. Of these, bullying is the most prevalent (Whitted & Dupper, 2005). According to Bowman (2001), 30% of students in grades 6 through 10 reported bullying others, being bullied, or both. According to Snell (2005), 29% of schools report bullying to be a serious problem. Also, approximately one-third of students reported being involved in fights or having property stolen or vandalized while at school (Snyder & Sickmund, 2006). These disruptive behaviors negatively affect student learning (Barnoski). To address the harmful impact of problem behaviors, national legislation has emphasized the importance of school safety and behavioral interventions. The No Child Left VOLUME 41 NUMBER 1 SEPTEMBER 2008","PeriodicalId":89924,"journal":{"name":"Focus on exceptional children","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on exceptional children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/FOEC.V41I1.6834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Policy makers, community members, parents, and school administrators all recognize that the safety of our public schools is of the utmost importance (Barnoski, 2001; Snell, 2005). Highly publicized incidents of shootings at our nation’s schools have raised public awareness of the need for safe schools and led to an outcry for reform (Leone, Mayer, Malmgren, & Meisel, 2000). Although incidents of extreme violence at schools should not be ignored, they do not accurately represent the degree of safety in U.S. schools. In reality, incidents of violence at schools have steadily decreased over the past 15 years, few schools are considered to be persistently dangerous under federal guidelines, and for many students schools are significantly safer than the neighborhoods in which they live (Snell; Leone et al.). Despite the increasing safety of public schools, disruptive behavior and school violence are still pressing issues. The Juvenile Offenders and Victims: National Report (Snyder & Sickmund, 2006) describes continuing concerns with violence in schools. For instance, alarming percentages of students reported carrying weapons (6.1%) or threatened with a weapon (9.2%) at school. Less severe forms of school violence are also problematic. For example, in a survey conducted in Washington State, 78% of elementary school teachers, 81% of middle school teachers, and 66% of high school teachers indicated that decreasing disruptive behavior was one of the top three priorities at their schools (Barnoski, 2001). Moreover, disruptive behaviors were cited as having a significantly negative impact on students’ ability to learn. Low-severity violent behaviors may include classroom disruptions, noncompliance, teasing and bullying, theft, property damage, and fighting. Of these, bullying is the most prevalent (Whitted & Dupper, 2005). According to Bowman (2001), 30% of students in grades 6 through 10 reported bullying others, being bullied, or both. According to Snell (2005), 29% of schools report bullying to be a serious problem. Also, approximately one-third of students reported being involved in fights or having property stolen or vandalized while at school (Snyder & Sickmund, 2006). These disruptive behaviors negatively affect student learning (Barnoski). To address the harmful impact of problem behaviors, national legislation has emphasized the importance of school safety and behavioral interventions. The No Child Left VOLUME 41 NUMBER 1 SEPTEMBER 2008
排斥学校中的积极行为支持:基于我们所知的实践方法。
政策制定者、社区成员、家长和学校管理人员都认识到,我们公立学校的安全至关重要(Barnoski,2001;Snell,2005)。在我国学校发生的备受关注的枪击事件提高了公众对安全学校必要性的认识,并引发了对改革的强烈抗议(Leone,Mayer,Malmgren,&Meisel,2000)。尽管学校发生的极端暴力事件不应被忽视,但它们并不能准确地代表美国学校的安全程度。事实上,在过去的15年里,学校暴力事件稳步减少,根据联邦指导方针,很少有学校被认为是持续危险的,对许多学生来说,学校比他们居住的社区安全得多(Snell;Leone等人)。尽管公立学校的安全性越来越高,破坏行为和校园暴力仍然是紧迫的问题。《青少年罪犯和受害者:国家报告》(Snyder和Sickmund,2006年)描述了对学校暴力行为的持续关注。例如,报告在学校携带武器(6.1%)或受到武器威胁(9.2%)的学生比例惊人。较不严重的学校暴力形式也存在问题。例如,在华盛顿州进行的一项调查中,78%的小学教师、81%的中学教师和66%的高中教师表示,减少破坏行为是学校的三大优先事项之一(Barnoski,2001)。此外,破坏性行为被认为对学生的学习能力有显著的负面影响。严重程度较低的暴力行为可能包括扰乱课堂、不遵守规定、戏弄和欺凌、盗窃、财产损失和打架。其中,欺凌最为普遍(Whitted&Dupper,2005)。根据Bowman(2001)的研究,在6至10年级的学生中,30%的人报告说欺负他人、被欺负,或者两者兼而有之。根据Snell(2005)的研究,29%的学校认为欺凌是一个严重的问题。此外,大约三分之一的学生报告称,他们在学校期间卷入斗殴或财产被盗或遭到破坏(Snyder和Sickmund,2006年)。这些破坏性行为会对学生的学习产生负面影响(Barnoski)。为了解决问题行为的有害影响,国家立法强调了学校安全和行为干预的重要性。《没有一个孩子离开》第41卷第1期2008年9月
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信