Robot-assisted hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy

E. M. D. Groot, Feike Kingma, L. Goense, S. Horst, J. W. Berg, R. Hillegersberg, J. Ruurda
{"title":"Robot-assisted hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy","authors":"E. M. D. Groot, Feike Kingma, L. Goense, S. Horst, J. W. Berg, R. Hillegersberg, J. Ruurda","doi":"10.21037/AOE-20-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In two-stage minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), most surgeons use a stapling device to avoid the challenges of thoracoscopic suturing in the upper mediastinum. However, in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), the surgeon benefits from increased dexterity that facilitates the construction of a hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a refined technique for the robot-assisted hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis in RAMIE, which was introduced in 2016 in our center. Methods: Patients who underwent RAMIE with a robot-assisted hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis between 1 November 2019 and 1 November 2020 were included in the current retrospective study. During this time frame, the technique was uniform and no more refinements were made. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. Main elements of the anastomotic technique included supportive stay-stitches to keep esophageal mucosa to the muscular wall, manual barbed suturing of the posterior and anterior wall, placement of tension releasing stitches and covering of the anastomosis with omentum. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage and secondary outcomes included the duration of anastomosis construction. Results: During the inclusion period, 22 patients were included in the study. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 3 patients (14%), which involved a grade I leak in 2 patients (9%) and grade 3 leakage in 1 patient (5%). The total duration of anastomosis construction was 37 minutes (range, 25–48 minutes). Conclusions: This study shows that a robot-assisted hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis can yield good outcomes in RAMIE.","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-20-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: In two-stage minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), most surgeons use a stapling device to avoid the challenges of thoracoscopic suturing in the upper mediastinum. However, in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), the surgeon benefits from increased dexterity that facilitates the construction of a hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a refined technique for the robot-assisted hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis in RAMIE, which was introduced in 2016 in our center. Methods: Patients who underwent RAMIE with a robot-assisted hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis between 1 November 2019 and 1 November 2020 were included in the current retrospective study. During this time frame, the technique was uniform and no more refinements were made. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. Main elements of the anastomotic technique included supportive stay-stitches to keep esophageal mucosa to the muscular wall, manual barbed suturing of the posterior and anterior wall, placement of tension releasing stitches and covering of the anastomosis with omentum. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage and secondary outcomes included the duration of anastomosis construction. Results: During the inclusion period, 22 patients were included in the study. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 3 patients (14%), which involved a grade I leak in 2 patients (9%) and grade 3 leakage in 1 patient (5%). The total duration of anastomosis construction was 37 minutes (range, 25–48 minutes). Conclusions: This study shows that a robot-assisted hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis can yield good outcomes in RAMIE.
食管切除术后机器人辅助手缝胸内吻合
背景:在两阶段微创食管切除术(MIE)中,大多数外科医生使用缝合装置来避免胸腔镜在上纵隔缝合的挑战。然而,在机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)中,外科医生受益于增加的灵活性,这有助于构建手工缝合的胸内吻合。本研究旨在评估我们中心于2016年推出的机器人辅助手工缝合RAMIE胸腔内吻合术的改进技术的结果。方法:将2019年11月1日至2020年11月31日期间接受机器人辅助手缝胸内吻合RAMIE的患者纳入当前的回顾性研究。在这段时间里,技术是统一的,没有进行更多的改进。数据是从前瞻性维护的数据库中提取的。吻合技术的主要内容包括将食管粘膜固定在肌壁上的支撑性缝线、后壁和前壁的手动倒钩缝合、张力释放缝线的放置以及用网膜覆盖吻合。主要结果是吻合口瘘,次要结果包括吻合口构建的持续时间。结果:在纳入期内,22名患者被纳入研究。吻合口渗漏发生在3名患者(14%)中,其中2名患者出现I级渗漏(9%),1名患者出现3级渗漏(5%)。吻合的总持续时间为37分钟(范围为25-48分钟)。结论:本研究表明,机器人辅助手工缝合胸内吻合在RAMIE中可以产生良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信