Assessing the effects of Close-to-Nature Forestry on forest birds in the eastern United States: A case study and way forward

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
James M. Gresh, J. Courter
{"title":"Assessing the effects of Close-to-Nature Forestry on forest birds in the eastern United States: A case study and way forward","authors":"James M. Gresh, J. Courter","doi":"10.1177/17581559221121712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last half-century, North American forest birds have experienced staggering declines, while at the same time, many metrics indicate that North American forest health has improved. While the United States has been recognised for global leadership in innovation and research in forestry, the negative impacts of high-severity harvesting methods and forest fragmentation are sometimes overlooked, and a dearth of research studies exist that assess the impacts of lower-severity forestry practices on birds. Globally, some regions are pursuing markedly different forestry practices, and one example is Europe’s Close-To-Nature Forestry (CTNF) that protects forest canopies. Historically, CTNF methods have not been promoted to help avian abundance or diversity; however, forest bird populations in Europe have increased 7% over the last two decades, and we posit whether similar forest management approaches in the eastern USA could benefit North American birds. Therefore, we sought to 1) assess the effects of forest structural characteristics on avian species richness in a CTNF-managed forest in the eastern USA; 2) compare our results to county-level eBird data to identify the challenges of assessing the impacts of forestry practices on birds at landscape scales; 3) highlight the ambiguities in current forest management guidelines for improving avian habitats in the USA and 4) suggest long-term direction for evaluating the impacts of alternative forest management practices on birds. Our case study provides preliminary evidence that CTNF-managed forests may support diverse birds of high conservation value that are normally drawn to different forest management extremes. We also provide recommendations for utilising eBird data to assess alternative forest management strategies at landscape scales and a synthesised look at the forest management guidelines provided by many of the major players in American ornithology. While there may be multiple reasons for forest bird declines noted in the past 50 years in North America, long-standing forest management practices and policies should not be overlooked.","PeriodicalId":55408,"journal":{"name":"Avian Biology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"161 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Biology Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17581559221121712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last half-century, North American forest birds have experienced staggering declines, while at the same time, many metrics indicate that North American forest health has improved. While the United States has been recognised for global leadership in innovation and research in forestry, the negative impacts of high-severity harvesting methods and forest fragmentation are sometimes overlooked, and a dearth of research studies exist that assess the impacts of lower-severity forestry practices on birds. Globally, some regions are pursuing markedly different forestry practices, and one example is Europe’s Close-To-Nature Forestry (CTNF) that protects forest canopies. Historically, CTNF methods have not been promoted to help avian abundance or diversity; however, forest bird populations in Europe have increased 7% over the last two decades, and we posit whether similar forest management approaches in the eastern USA could benefit North American birds. Therefore, we sought to 1) assess the effects of forest structural characteristics on avian species richness in a CTNF-managed forest in the eastern USA; 2) compare our results to county-level eBird data to identify the challenges of assessing the impacts of forestry practices on birds at landscape scales; 3) highlight the ambiguities in current forest management guidelines for improving avian habitats in the USA and 4) suggest long-term direction for evaluating the impacts of alternative forest management practices on birds. Our case study provides preliminary evidence that CTNF-managed forests may support diverse birds of high conservation value that are normally drawn to different forest management extremes. We also provide recommendations for utilising eBird data to assess alternative forest management strategies at landscape scales and a synthesised look at the forest management guidelines provided by many of the major players in American ornithology. While there may be multiple reasons for forest bird declines noted in the past 50 years in North America, long-standing forest management practices and policies should not be overlooked.
评估接近自然的森林对美国东部森林鸟类的影响:一个案例研究和未来的方向
在过去的半个世纪里,北美森林鸟类数量急剧下降,与此同时,许多指标表明北美森林健康状况有所改善。尽管美国在林业创新和研究方面的全球领先地位得到了认可,但高强度采伐方法和森林破碎化的负面影响有时被忽视,而且缺乏评估低强度林业做法对鸟类影响的研究。在全球范围内,一些地区正在推行明显不同的林业做法,欧洲保护森林树冠的亲近自然林业就是一个例子。从历史上看,CTNF方法并没有被推广来帮助鸟类的丰度或多样性;然而,在过去的二十年里,欧洲的森林鸟类数量增加了7%,我们推测美国东部类似的森林管理方法是否有利于北美鸟类。因此,我们试图1)评估美国东部CTNF管理的森林中森林结构特征对鸟类物种丰富度的影响;2) 将我们的结果与县级eBird数据进行比较,以确定在景观尺度上评估林业实践对鸟类影响的挑战;3) 强调了美国目前改善鸟类栖息地的森林管理指南中的模糊性,4)为评估替代森林管理做法对鸟类的影响提出了长期方向。我们的案例研究提供了初步证据,证明CTNF管理的森林可能支持具有高保护价值的各种鸟类,这些鸟类通常被吸引到不同的森林管理极端。我们还提供了利用eBird数据在景观尺度上评估替代森林管理策略的建议,并综合研究了美国鸟类学中许多主要参与者提供的森林管理指南。尽管在过去50年中,北美森林鸟类数量减少可能有多种原因,但不应忽视长期的森林管理做法和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Avian Biology Research
Avian Biology Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Avian Biology Research provides a forum for the publication of research in every field of ornithology. It covers all aspects of pure and applied ornithology for wild or captive species as well as research that does not readily fit within the publication objectives of other ornithological journals. By considering a wide range of research fields for publication, Avian Biology Research provides a forum for people working in every field of ornithology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信