Legal distance moderation in the inter-partner technology distance on cross-country equity investments: A multilevel analysis of the information & communication technology sector

IF 1.2 Q4 MANAGEMENT
T. Malik, Chunhui Huo, K. Nielsen
{"title":"Legal distance moderation in the inter-partner technology distance on cross-country equity investments: A multilevel analysis of the information & communication technology sector","authors":"T. Malik, Chunhui Huo, K. Nielsen","doi":"10.1177/03063070221123052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ICT (information & communication technology) sector has increased inter-firm equity investment across countries, and scholars have explicated the role of technological distance or institutional distance to explain the equity size. This study extends the framework to integrate the legal distance (institutional) as a moderator between the technological distance (orientation) and the equity size in cross country investment decisions. Empirically, little is known about whether the legal distance between the home and host countries of high technology firm influences its equity decisions. This study addresses this question using equity deals in the ICT sector during a critical period (2007–2009). Multilevel analysis is based on 51,198 inter-firm equity deals, 120 home countries, 154 host countries, 19,712 equity investing firms and 32,987 equity target firms. This robust analysis offers sever insights. First, the inter-firm technological proximity predicts higher equity than the inter-firm technological distance. In other words, the technology strategy firm invests equity more than a non-technology firm. Second, the inter-legal distance (home-host) between partners predicts lower equity than the inter-legal proximities between the investor and target. Third, the inter-legal distance moderates the technological orientation, predicting that the effect of technological distance decreases the coefficient by 49%, and the effect of the legal distance coefficient increases by 49%. This study contributes to the international business equity investment decision in the high technology sectors to manage uncertainty. The study contributes to institutional contingencies in this field by integrating them with technological contingencies. In addition, it rests on a robust methodology (multilevel) for the academic audience and managerial implications for the business audience.","PeriodicalId":46142,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070221123052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The ICT (information & communication technology) sector has increased inter-firm equity investment across countries, and scholars have explicated the role of technological distance or institutional distance to explain the equity size. This study extends the framework to integrate the legal distance (institutional) as a moderator between the technological distance (orientation) and the equity size in cross country investment decisions. Empirically, little is known about whether the legal distance between the home and host countries of high technology firm influences its equity decisions. This study addresses this question using equity deals in the ICT sector during a critical period (2007–2009). Multilevel analysis is based on 51,198 inter-firm equity deals, 120 home countries, 154 host countries, 19,712 equity investing firms and 32,987 equity target firms. This robust analysis offers sever insights. First, the inter-firm technological proximity predicts higher equity than the inter-firm technological distance. In other words, the technology strategy firm invests equity more than a non-technology firm. Second, the inter-legal distance (home-host) between partners predicts lower equity than the inter-legal proximities between the investor and target. Third, the inter-legal distance moderates the technological orientation, predicting that the effect of technological distance decreases the coefficient by 49%, and the effect of the legal distance coefficient increases by 49%. This study contributes to the international business equity investment decision in the high technology sectors to manage uncertainty. The study contributes to institutional contingencies in this field by integrating them with technological contingencies. In addition, it rests on a robust methodology (multilevel) for the academic audience and managerial implications for the business audience.
跨国股权投资合伙人间技术距离中的法律距离调节:信息与通信技术部门的多层次分析
ICT(信息和通信技术)部门增加了各国企业间的股权投资,学者们解释了技术距离或制度距离在解释股权规模方面的作用。本研究扩展了框架,将法律距离(制度)作为跨国投资决策中技术距离(方向)和股权规模之间的调节因素。从经验上看,高科技企业的母国和东道国之间的法律距离是否会影响其股权决策,目前还知之甚少。本研究利用关键时期(2007-2009年)信息和通信技术部门的股权交易解决了这一问题。多层次分析基于51198笔公司间股权交易、120个母国、154个东道国、19712家股权投资公司和32987家股权目标公司。这种稳健的分析提供了深刻的见解。首先,企业间技术接近度比企业间技术距离预测更高的股权。换句话说,科技战略公司比非科技公司投资更多的股权。其次,合伙人之间的法律间距离(母国-东道国)预测的股权低于投资者和目标之间的法律之间的接近度。第三,法律间距离调节了技术取向,预测技术距离的影响使系数降低49%,法律距离系数的影响增加49%。本研究有助于国际企业在高科技领域进行股权投资决策,以管理不确定性。这项研究通过将制度突发事件与技术突发事件相结合,为该领域的制度突发事件做出了贡献。此外,它还基于一种针对学术受众的稳健方法论(多层次)和针对商业受众的管理启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Journal of General Management is quarterly peer reviewed journal, with a mission to provide thought leadership by publishing articles on managerial practices with organisation-wide or cross-functional implications. We seek original theoretical and practical insights into general management in all types of organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信