Follow-up of severely injured patients can be embedded in routine hospital care: results from a feasibility study

E. Wake, C. Brandenburg, K. Heathcote, Kate Dale, Don Campbell, M. Cardona
{"title":"Follow-up of severely injured patients can be embedded in routine hospital care: results from a feasibility study","authors":"E. Wake, C. Brandenburg, K. Heathcote, Kate Dale, Don Campbell, M. Cardona","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2022.2054633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective Understanding the longitudinal patient experience outcomes following major trauma can promote successful recovery. A novel, hospital-led telephone follow-up program was implemented by a multi-disciplinary clinical trauma service team at a Level I trauma center. This process evaluation examined what factors promoted or impeded the program’s implementation. Methods A prospective convergent mixed-methods process evaluation design was used. Quantitative data included patient and injury demographics and program feasibility data such number of telephone calls attempted/completed and call duration. Qualitative data consisted of semi-structured interviews with program participants (staff, patients, and caregivers) who had participated in the program. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were applied to quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Data were collected concurrently and merged in the results to understand and describe the implementation and sustainability of the program.274 major trauma patients (ISS ≥ 12) were eligible for follow-up. A response rate of over 75% was achieved, with nurses responsible for most of the calls. Limited time and competing clinical demands were identified as barriers to the timely completion of the calls. Results Participants valued the preexisting trauma service/patient relationship, and this facilitated program implementation. Clinicians were motivated to evaluate their patient’s recovery, whilst patients felt ‘cared for’ and ‘not forgotten’ post-hospital discharge. Teamwork and leadership were highly valued by the clinical staff throughout the implementation period as ongoing source of motivation and support. Staff spontaneously developed the program to incorporate clinical follow-up processes by providing guidance, advice, and referrals to patients who indicated ongoing issues such as pain or emotional problems. Conclusion Telephone follow-up within a clinical trauma service team is feasible, accepted by staff and valued by patients and families. Despite time constraints, the successful implementation of this program is reliant on existing clinical/patient relationships, staff teamwork and leadership support.","PeriodicalId":75913,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice","volume":"50 1","pages":"138 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2022.2054633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Understanding the longitudinal patient experience outcomes following major trauma can promote successful recovery. A novel, hospital-led telephone follow-up program was implemented by a multi-disciplinary clinical trauma service team at a Level I trauma center. This process evaluation examined what factors promoted or impeded the program’s implementation. Methods A prospective convergent mixed-methods process evaluation design was used. Quantitative data included patient and injury demographics and program feasibility data such number of telephone calls attempted/completed and call duration. Qualitative data consisted of semi-structured interviews with program participants (staff, patients, and caregivers) who had participated in the program. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were applied to quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Data were collected concurrently and merged in the results to understand and describe the implementation and sustainability of the program.274 major trauma patients (ISS ≥ 12) were eligible for follow-up. A response rate of over 75% was achieved, with nurses responsible for most of the calls. Limited time and competing clinical demands were identified as barriers to the timely completion of the calls. Results Participants valued the preexisting trauma service/patient relationship, and this facilitated program implementation. Clinicians were motivated to evaluate their patient’s recovery, whilst patients felt ‘cared for’ and ‘not forgotten’ post-hospital discharge. Teamwork and leadership were highly valued by the clinical staff throughout the implementation period as ongoing source of motivation and support. Staff spontaneously developed the program to incorporate clinical follow-up processes by providing guidance, advice, and referrals to patients who indicated ongoing issues such as pain or emotional problems. Conclusion Telephone follow-up within a clinical trauma service team is feasible, accepted by staff and valued by patients and families. Despite time constraints, the successful implementation of this program is reliant on existing clinical/patient relationships, staff teamwork and leadership support.
一项可行性研究的结果:重伤员的随访可纳入常规医院护理
摘要目的了解重大创伤后患者的纵向体验结果可以促进成功的康复。一级创伤中心的多学科临床创伤服务团队实施了一项新颖的、由医院主导的电话随访计划。该过程评估考察了哪些因素促进或阻碍了该计划的实施。方法采用前瞻性收敛混合方法进行过程评价设计。定量数据包括患者和受伤人口统计数据以及项目可行性数据,如尝试/完成的电话数量和通话持续时间。定性数据包括对参与该项目的项目参与者(工作人员、患者和护理人员)的半结构化访谈。描述性统计和专题分析分别应用于定量和定性数据。同时收集数据并合并到结果中,以了解和描述该计划的实施和可持续性。274名重大创伤患者(ISS≥12)有资格接受随访。响应率超过75%,大部分电话都由护士负责。有限的时间和相互竞争的临床需求被确定为及时完成呼叫的障碍。结果参与者重视先前存在的创伤服务/患者关系,这有助于项目的实施。临床医生有动力评估患者的康复情况,而患者出院后感到“得到了照顾”和“没有被遗忘”。在整个实施期间,团队合作和领导力受到临床工作人员的高度重视,是激励和支持的持续来源。工作人员自发制定了该计划,通过向出现疼痛或情绪问题等持续问题的患者提供指导、建议和转诊,将临床随访过程纳入其中。结论在临床创伤服务团队内进行电话随访是可行的,为工作人员所接受,并受到患者和家属的重视。尽管时间有限,但该计划的成功实施取决于现有的临床/患者关系、员工团队合作和领导支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信