Growth rate and economic evaluation of mixed stands established with Cedrus libani and Pinus nigra

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
N. Erkan, Edanur Ayhan
{"title":"Growth rate and economic evaluation of mixed stands established with Cedrus libani and Pinus nigra","authors":"N. Erkan, Edanur Ayhan","doi":"10.1080/02827581.2023.2219461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aimed to (1) investigate the long-term results of Cedrus libani + Pinus nigra mixed afforestation and (2) compare it with pure P. nigra afforestation in terms of wood production, economic return, and carbon (C) sequestration. The study was conducted in Elazığ-Sivrice, southeastern Turkey. Data were collected from six sample plots, and stem analysis for each species in the mixed stand was performed to reveal the growth and development of the basal-area-averaged trees. Statistical analyses showed that the pure P. nigra stands were superior to the mixed stands in terms of wood production (236 m3 ha−1 vs. 150 m3 ha−1), wood economic value ($19,551 ha−1 vs. $11,483 ha−1), and C sequestration (93 t ha−1 vs. 64 t C ha−1) at 54 years old. The lower values calculated for the mixed stand may have been due to the incompatible growth curves of the two species. These results imply that if the aim is to obtain wood products, pure P. nigra stands may be more advantageous than mixtures of C. libani and P. nigra for afforestation.","PeriodicalId":21352,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research","volume":"38 1","pages":"344 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2023.2219461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aimed to (1) investigate the long-term results of Cedrus libani + Pinus nigra mixed afforestation and (2) compare it with pure P. nigra afforestation in terms of wood production, economic return, and carbon (C) sequestration. The study was conducted in Elazığ-Sivrice, southeastern Turkey. Data were collected from six sample plots, and stem analysis for each species in the mixed stand was performed to reveal the growth and development of the basal-area-averaged trees. Statistical analyses showed that the pure P. nigra stands were superior to the mixed stands in terms of wood production (236 m3 ha−1 vs. 150 m3 ha−1), wood economic value ($19,551 ha−1 vs. $11,483 ha−1), and C sequestration (93 t ha−1 vs. 64 t C ha−1) at 54 years old. The lower values calculated for the mixed stand may have been due to the incompatible growth curves of the two species. These results imply that if the aim is to obtain wood products, pure P. nigra stands may be more advantageous than mixtures of C. libani and P. nigra for afforestation.
雪松与黑松混交林生长速率及经济评价
摘要:本研究旨在(1)研究杉木+黑松混合造林的长期效果,(2)与纯黑松造林在木材产量、经济效益和碳(C)固存方面进行比较。这项研究在土耳其东南部的Elazığ-Sivrice进行。利用6个样地的数据,对混交林各树种进行了茎干分析,揭示了基区平均树木的生长发育情况。统计分析表明,纯黑松林在木材产量(236 m3 ha - 1比150 m3 ha - 1)、木材经济价值(19,551 ha - 1美元比11,483 ha - 1美元)和54岁时碳固存(93 tha - 1比64 t C - ha - 1)方面优于混合林分。混交林的计算值较低可能是由于两种树种的生长曲线不相容。这些结果表明,如果目的是获得木材产品,纯黑桫椤林分可能比黑桫椤和黑桫椤混合林分更有利于造林。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
26
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research is a leading international research journal with a focus on forests and forestry in boreal and temperate regions worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信