Hybrid Between PIECES Framework and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Quality Testing Of Mobile Application Office Automation System (eKEMENKEU)

Q3 Engineering
Ade Achmad Zulfahmi, Rifki Sadikin, Eni Heni Hermaliani
{"title":"Hybrid Between PIECES Framework and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Quality Testing Of Mobile Application Office Automation System (eKEMENKEU)","authors":"Ade Achmad Zulfahmi, Rifki Sadikin, Eni Heni Hermaliani","doi":"10.37385/jaets.v4i1.1087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital transformation is a necessity that must be carried out by the government that provides public services. The success of digital transformation is to innovate the Office Automation System Mobile Application System (eKemenkeu application) based on Android/IOS to support simplification of business processes so that they can be easily accessed via smartphone devices. To get feedback on the quality of the eKemenkeu application, testing was carried out using the PIECES Framework and by selecting the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) variable, as well as the Smart PLS 3.0 tool. The study analyzed 100 respondent data using 7 hypotheses with the results of 2 accepted hypotheses, namely H1 Original Sample value (0.335) and t-statistics (2.864) and H7 Original Sample (0.748) and t-statistics (10.401), and the second significance level is above 0, 05. Meanwhile, 5 hypotheses were rejected, because the t-statistic value was > 1.96 and the significance level of the p-value was below 0.05. The results of the Discriminate Validity test ranged in value (0.786 - 0.949). Composite Reliability ranges in value (0.828 - 0.949) or is accepted because it is above 0.7. Cronbach's Alpha range of values (0.721-0.920) or satisfactory > 0.7 .","PeriodicalId":34350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v4i1.1087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Digital transformation is a necessity that must be carried out by the government that provides public services. The success of digital transformation is to innovate the Office Automation System Mobile Application System (eKemenkeu application) based on Android/IOS to support simplification of business processes so that they can be easily accessed via smartphone devices. To get feedback on the quality of the eKemenkeu application, testing was carried out using the PIECES Framework and by selecting the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) variable, as well as the Smart PLS 3.0 tool. The study analyzed 100 respondent data using 7 hypotheses with the results of 2 accepted hypotheses, namely H1 Original Sample value (0.335) and t-statistics (2.864) and H7 Original Sample (0.748) and t-statistics (10.401), and the second significance level is above 0, 05. Meanwhile, 5 hypotheses were rejected, because the t-statistic value was > 1.96 and the significance level of the p-value was below 0.05. The results of the Discriminate Validity test ranged in value (0.786 - 0.949). Composite Reliability ranges in value (0.828 - 0.949) or is accepted because it is above 0.7. Cronbach's Alpha range of values (0.721-0.920) or satisfactory > 0.7 .
移动应用办公自动化系统(eKEMENKEU)质量测试中PIECES框架与技术接受模型(TAM)的混合
数字化转型是提供公共服务的政府必须进行的。数字化转型的成功在于创新了基于Android/IOS的办公自动化系统移动应用系统(eKemenkeu Application),以支持简化业务流程,使其可以通过智能手机设备轻松访问。为了获得关于eKemenkeu应用程序质量的反馈,使用PIECES框架并通过选择技术接受模型(TAM)变量以及Smart PLS 3.0工具进行了测试。本研究采用7个假设对100个被调查者的数据进行分析,得到2个接受假设的结果,即H1原始样本值(0.335)和t统计量(2.864),H7原始样本值(0.748)和t统计量(10.401),第二次显著性水平在0.05以上。同时,5个假设被拒绝,因为t统计值为bb0 1.96, p值的显著性水平低于0.05。区别效度检验的结果在0.786 - 0.949之间。复合信度的取值范围为(0.828 - 0.949)或高于0.7被接受。Cronbach's Alpha值范围(0.721-0.920)或满意的> 0.7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信