Confidence Intervals of a Loss Based PCI Using Exponentiated-Exponential Distributed Quality Characteristics

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Mahendra Saha, S. Dey
{"title":"Confidence Intervals of a Loss Based PCI Using Exponentiated-Exponential Distributed Quality Characteristics","authors":"Mahendra Saha, S. Dey","doi":"10.1080/01966324.2023.2175632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Process capability indices (PCIs) are most effective devices/techniques used in industries for determining the quality of products and performance of manufacturing processes. In this article, we consider the process capability index which is based on an asymmetric loss function (linear exponential) and is applicable to normally as well as non-normally distributed processes. In order to estimate the PCI when the process follows exponentiated exponential distribution, we have used ten classical methods of estimation and the performances of these classical estimates for the index are compared in terms of mean squared errors (MSEs) through simulation study. Also, the confidence intervals for the index are constructed based on four bootstrap confidence interval (BCIs) methods. A simulation study is performed in order to compare the performance of these four BCIs in terms of average width and coverage probabilities. We use two published data sets related to electronic and food industries to illustrate the performance of the proposed methods of estimation and BCIs. All the data sets show that width of bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap interval is the lowest among all other considered BCIs.","PeriodicalId":35850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2023.2175632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Process capability indices (PCIs) are most effective devices/techniques used in industries for determining the quality of products and performance of manufacturing processes. In this article, we consider the process capability index which is based on an asymmetric loss function (linear exponential) and is applicable to normally as well as non-normally distributed processes. In order to estimate the PCI when the process follows exponentiated exponential distribution, we have used ten classical methods of estimation and the performances of these classical estimates for the index are compared in terms of mean squared errors (MSEs) through simulation study. Also, the confidence intervals for the index are constructed based on four bootstrap confidence interval (BCIs) methods. A simulation study is performed in order to compare the performance of these four BCIs in terms of average width and coverage probabilities. We use two published data sets related to electronic and food industries to illustrate the performance of the proposed methods of estimation and BCIs. All the data sets show that width of bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap interval is the lowest among all other considered BCIs.
基于指数分布质量特性的基于损失的PCI的置信区间
过程能力指数(PCIs)是工业中用于确定产品质量和制造过程性能的最有效的设备/技术。本文考虑基于非对称损失函数(线性指数)的过程能力指标,该指标适用于正态分布和非正态分布过程。为了估计过程服从指数指数分布时的PCI,我们使用了十种经典的估计方法,并通过仿真研究比较了这些经典估计方法对指标的均方误差(MSEs)的性能。此外,基于四种自举置信区间方法构造了指数的置信区间。为了比较这四种bci在平均宽度和覆盖概率方面的性能,进行了模拟研究。我们使用与电子和食品行业相关的两个已发表的数据集来说明所提出的估计方法和bci的性能。所有数据集表明,偏差校正加速自举间隔的宽度是所有其他考虑的bci中最低的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences
American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信