The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Tofig Musayev, Rovshan Sadigbayli
{"title":"The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area","authors":"Tofig Musayev, Rovshan Sadigbayli","doi":"10.1163/18750230-02801006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reviews the purposes and principles of the u.n. Charter in light of persistent claims voiced in the context of protracted conflicts in the osce area that the principle of self-determination allegedly grants the right to unilateral secession. The drafting history of the Charter indicate that States did not recognise a right to unilateral secession of a part of population of a State as a means of exercising selfdetermination. Subsequent development of this principle in law and in practice in the decades after the adoption of the Charter to a large extent has been shaped by the original ideas and understanding that went into the Charter. Invalidation at the international level of secessionist claims and actions, collective non-recognition of the resulting situations and abstention from aid or assistance that contributes to their consolidation are among legal and political consequences that have been applied and need to be consistently maintained with regard to the protracted conflicts in the osce area and their settlement processes. * The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors. Downloaded from Brill.com05/05/2020 11:56:43PM via free access 181 The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter security and human rights 28 (2017) 180-213","PeriodicalId":39991,"journal":{"name":"Security and Human Rights","volume":"28 1","pages":"180-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18750230-02801006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security and Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02801006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reviews the purposes and principles of the u.n. Charter in light of persistent claims voiced in the context of protracted conflicts in the osce area that the principle of self-determination allegedly grants the right to unilateral secession. The drafting history of the Charter indicate that States did not recognise a right to unilateral secession of a part of population of a State as a means of exercising selfdetermination. Subsequent development of this principle in law and in practice in the decades after the adoption of the Charter to a large extent has been shaped by the original ideas and understanding that went into the Charter. Invalidation at the international level of secessionist claims and actions, collective non-recognition of the resulting situations and abstention from aid or assistance that contributes to their consolidation are among legal and political consequences that have been applied and need to be consistently maintained with regard to the protracted conflicts in the osce area and their settlement processes. * The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors. Downloaded from Brill.com05/05/2020 11:56:43PM via free access 181 The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter security and human rights 28 (2017) 180-213
《联合国宪章》的宗旨和原则的起源、法律和实践的后续发展以及在欧安组织地区单方面分离要求背景下的(错误)解释
文章回顾了联合国宪章的宗旨和原则,在欧安组织地区长期冲突的背景下不断提出的主张,即自决原则据称赋予了单方面分离的权利。《宪章》的起草历史表明,各国并不承认一个国家的一部分人口单方面脱离的权利是行使自决的一种手段。在《宪章》通过后的几十年里,这一原则在法律和实践中的后续发展在很大程度上是由《宪章》的原始思想和理解形成的。在国际一级使分离主义的要求和行动无效,集体不承认所造成的局势,不提供有助于巩固这些局势的援助或援助,这些都是对欧安组织地区的长期冲突及其解决进程所产生的法律和政治后果,而且需要始终保持下去。*本文仅代表作者的观点。181联合国宪章的宗旨和原则、安全与人权28 (2017)180-213
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Security and Human Rights
Security and Human Rights Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Security and Human Rights (formerly Helsinki Monitor) is a quarterly journal devoted to issues inspired by the work and principles of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). It looks at the challenge of building security through cooperation across the northern hemisphere, from Vancouver to Vladivostok, as well as how this experience can be applied to other parts of the world. It aims to stimulate thinking on the question of protecting and promoting human rights in a world faced with serious threats to security.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信