T. Kłosiewicz, M. Rut, Sylwia Jałtuszewska, Andrzej Rut, Radosław Zalewski, Piotr Ziemak, M. Ladzinska, R. Podlewski, M. Puślecki
{"title":"Paramedic students need more training in left ventricular assist device — a pilot simulation study","authors":"T. Kłosiewicz, M. Rut, Sylwia Jałtuszewska, Andrzej Rut, Radosław Zalewski, Piotr Ziemak, M. Ladzinska, R. Podlewski, M. Puślecki","doi":"10.5603/demj.a2023.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Mechanical Circulation Systems are a promising therapy for patients with end-stage of heart failure. Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) enforces using of concomitant anticoagulant therapy. This may lead to severe complications. LVAD patients are more and more frequent users of the emergency department. There are several differences in cardiovascular function in these patients, as well as on examination. Its interpretation may be challenging and result in potentially fatal conclusions. The aim of this research was to assess the skills of paramedic students in assessing patients with LVAD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was designed as a simulation study. The aim of this scenario was to provide a full primary survey of an unconscious, spontaneously breathing person with an LVAD pump implanted. Ten groups of paramedic students from Polish medical universities took part in this study. RESULTS: Four teams started chest compressions unnecessarily. Of them, only one had contacted LVAD local coordinator and discontinued after short instructions. Four teams completed the driveline and device check and six checked only the line without moving the controller. No major errors were noted in the field of airway assessment and management as well as assessment of consciousness, breathing, and circulation. CONCLUSIONS: More attention should be paid to educating paramedic students in LVAD therapy. Educators should focus mainly on differences in cardiovascular function and pay attention to complete perfusion assessment. Medical simulation seems to be a good tool for assessing difficult clinical cases rarely encountered in practice.","PeriodicalId":52339,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/demj.a2023.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mechanical Circulation Systems are a promising therapy for patients with end-stage of heart failure. Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) enforces using of concomitant anticoagulant therapy. This may lead to severe complications. LVAD patients are more and more frequent users of the emergency department. There are several differences in cardiovascular function in these patients, as well as on examination. Its interpretation may be challenging and result in potentially fatal conclusions. The aim of this research was to assess the skills of paramedic students in assessing patients with LVAD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was designed as a simulation study. The aim of this scenario was to provide a full primary survey of an unconscious, spontaneously breathing person with an LVAD pump implanted. Ten groups of paramedic students from Polish medical universities took part in this study. RESULTS: Four teams started chest compressions unnecessarily. Of them, only one had contacted LVAD local coordinator and discontinued after short instructions. Four teams completed the driveline and device check and six checked only the line without moving the controller. No major errors were noted in the field of airway assessment and management as well as assessment of consciousness, breathing, and circulation. CONCLUSIONS: More attention should be paid to educating paramedic students in LVAD therapy. Educators should focus mainly on differences in cardiovascular function and pay attention to complete perfusion assessment. Medical simulation seems to be a good tool for assessing difficult clinical cases rarely encountered in practice.