N. Stech, M. McGrath, P. Laszczak, A. Kercher, S. Zahedi, D. Moser
{"title":"BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT PROSTHETIC TECHNOLOGIES FOR TRANS-FEMORAL AMPUTEES DURING SLOPE DESCENT","authors":"N. Stech, M. McGrath, P. Laszczak, A. Kercher, S. Zahedi, D. Moser","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v1i2.32012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION \nLower limb amputees have different biomechanics to able-bodied people when walking on slopes1,2, often struggling to negotiate different gradients safely. Loss of proprioception and muscular control contributes to this issue, which is a particular problem for trans-femoral amputees, where both ankle and knee joints are absent. Studies have shown that prosthetic technologies can have benefits for slope negotiation. The aim of this study was to isolate the specific effects of different trans-femoral prosthetic technologies, by applying each additional mechanism incrementally. \nAbstract PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/32012/24431 \nHow to cite: Stech N, McGrath M, Laszczak P, Kercher A, Zahedi S, Moser D. BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT PROSTHETIC TECHNOLOGIES FOR TRANS-FEMORAL AMPUTEES DURING SLOPE DESCENT. CANADIAN PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS JOURNAL, VOLUME 1, ISSUE 2, 2018; ABSTRACT, POSTER PRESENTATION AT THE AOPA’S 101ST NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, SEPT. 26-29, VANCOUVER, CANADA, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v1i2.32012 \nAbstracts were Peer-reviewed by the American Orthotic Prosthetic Association (AOPA) 101st National Assembly Scientific Committee. \nhttp://www.aopanet.org/ \n ","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v1i2.32012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Lower limb amputees have different biomechanics to able-bodied people when walking on slopes1,2, often struggling to negotiate different gradients safely. Loss of proprioception and muscular control contributes to this issue, which is a particular problem for trans-femoral amputees, where both ankle and knee joints are absent. Studies have shown that prosthetic technologies can have benefits for slope negotiation. The aim of this study was to isolate the specific effects of different trans-femoral prosthetic technologies, by applying each additional mechanism incrementally.
Abstract PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/32012/24431
How to cite: Stech N, McGrath M, Laszczak P, Kercher A, Zahedi S, Moser D. BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT PROSTHETIC TECHNOLOGIES FOR TRANS-FEMORAL AMPUTEES DURING SLOPE DESCENT. CANADIAN PROSTHETICS & ORTHOTICS JOURNAL, VOLUME 1, ISSUE 2, 2018; ABSTRACT, POSTER PRESENTATION AT THE AOPA’S 101ST NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, SEPT. 26-29, VANCOUVER, CANADA, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v1i2.32012
Abstracts were Peer-reviewed by the American Orthotic Prosthetic Association (AOPA) 101st National Assembly Scientific Committee.
http://www.aopanet.org/
下肢截肢者在斜坡1、2上行走时,其生物力学与正常人不同,往往难以安全地通过不同的坡度。本体感觉和肌肉控制的丧失导致了这一问题,这是经股截肢者的一个特殊问题,因为踝关节和膝关节都缺失了。研究表明,假体技术对斜坡协商有好处。本研究的目的是通过逐步应用每种附加机制来分离不同的经股假体技术的具体效果。摘要PDF链接:https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/32012/24431如何引用:Stech N, McGrath M, Laszczak P, Kercher A, Zahedi S, Moser D.不同假肢技术对经股截肢者斜坡下降的生物力学分析。加拿大假肢与矫形学杂志,2018年第1卷第2期;摘要:2018年9月26日至29日,加拿大温哥华,aopa第101届全国大会海报展示。摘要由美国矫形义肢协会(AOPA)第101届国民大会科学委员会同行评审。http://www.aopanet.org/