‘Something to be haunted by’: Adaptive monsters and regional mythologies in ‘The Forbidden’ and Candyman

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Adam R. Ochonicky
{"title":"‘Something to be haunted by’: Adaptive monsters and regional mythologies in ‘The Forbidden’ and Candyman","authors":"Adam R. Ochonicky","doi":"10.1386/host_00013_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since Bernard Rose’s Candyman (1992) was first released more than 25 years ago, there has been a great deal of scholarly commentary on the film’s treatment of class, race, gender and urban legends. To a lesser degree, Clive Barker’s short story, ‘The Forbidden’\n (1986), has received some critical attention largely because of its status as the source material for the film’s general premise and now-iconic central monster. This article expands on such existent scholarship by analysing regional mythologies and the cross-cultural adaptation of place-specific\n monsters within and across both texts. To develop these primary arguments, this article extracts a theory of adaptation and location from Neil Gaiman’s novel, American Gods ([2001] 2011), and applies that theory to the acts of adaptation pervading ‘The Forbidden’ and\n Candyman. In complementary ways, all three of these texts explicitly reflect on the complexities of adapting monsters to precise locales. Notably, both American Gods and Candyman take place in the American Midwest; this regional setting greatly impacts the conceptualization\n of each narrative’s supernatural beings (Gaiman’s cohort of gods and the Candyman, respectively). Within popular culture, the Midwest is regularly depicted as both a site of nostalgic memory and a cultural space defined by the willful forgetting or elision of history. This article\n asserts the importance of recognizing the Midwest as a recurrent staging ground for horror narratives, particularly those featuring monsters who embody forgotten, misremembered, suppressed or denied pieces of history. Further, by examining such regional dynamics in American Gods and\n Candyman, this article develops the concept of ‘adaptive monsters’, which describes horrific beings who assume symbolic attributes of the historical, cultural and/or spatial environments into which they are adapted. Overall, through analyses of ‘The Forbidden’,\n Candyman and American Gods, this article demonstrates how regional mythologies (especially those of the Midwest) shape the adaptation of monstrous beings in horror narratives and across textual forms.","PeriodicalId":41545,"journal":{"name":"Horror Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"101-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horror Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/host_00013_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since Bernard Rose’s Candyman (1992) was first released more than 25 years ago, there has been a great deal of scholarly commentary on the film’s treatment of class, race, gender and urban legends. To a lesser degree, Clive Barker’s short story, ‘The Forbidden’ (1986), has received some critical attention largely because of its status as the source material for the film’s general premise and now-iconic central monster. This article expands on such existent scholarship by analysing regional mythologies and the cross-cultural adaptation of place-specific monsters within and across both texts. To develop these primary arguments, this article extracts a theory of adaptation and location from Neil Gaiman’s novel, American Gods ([2001] 2011), and applies that theory to the acts of adaptation pervading ‘The Forbidden’ and Candyman. In complementary ways, all three of these texts explicitly reflect on the complexities of adapting monsters to precise locales. Notably, both American Gods and Candyman take place in the American Midwest; this regional setting greatly impacts the conceptualization of each narrative’s supernatural beings (Gaiman’s cohort of gods and the Candyman, respectively). Within popular culture, the Midwest is regularly depicted as both a site of nostalgic memory and a cultural space defined by the willful forgetting or elision of history. This article asserts the importance of recognizing the Midwest as a recurrent staging ground for horror narratives, particularly those featuring monsters who embody forgotten, misremembered, suppressed or denied pieces of history. Further, by examining such regional dynamics in American Gods and Candyman, this article develops the concept of ‘adaptive monsters’, which describes horrific beings who assume symbolic attributes of the historical, cultural and/or spatial environments into which they are adapted. Overall, through analyses of ‘The Forbidden’, Candyman and American Gods, this article demonstrates how regional mythologies (especially those of the Midwest) shape the adaptation of monstrous beings in horror narratives and across textual forms.
“令人困扰的东西”:《禁忌》和《糖果人》中的适应性怪物和地区神话
自从伯纳德·罗斯的《糖果人》(1992)在25年前首次上映以来,就有大量关于这部电影对阶级、种族、性别和都市传说的处理的学术评论。克莱夫·巴克(Clive Barker)的短篇小说《被禁》(The Forbidden, 1986)受到了一些评论界的关注,这在很大程度上是因为它是这部电影的基本背景和现在标志性的中央怪物的素材。本文通过分析两个文本内部和文本之间的地域神话和特定地方怪物的跨文化改编,扩展了现有的学术研究。为了发展这些主要论点,本文从尼尔·盖曼的小说《美国众神》([2001]2011)中提取了一种适应和地点理论,并将该理论应用于《禁忌》和《糖果人》中普遍存在的适应行为。以互补的方式,这三个文本都明确地反映了使怪物适应精确环境的复杂性。值得注意的是,《美国众神》和《糖果人》都发生在美国中西部;这种地域背景极大地影响了每个叙事中超自然存在的概念化(分别是盖曼的众神和糖果人)。在流行文化中,中西部经常被描述为怀旧记忆的场所,也是故意忘记或省略历史的文化空间。这篇文章强调了认识到中西部是恐怖故事的反复上演地的重要性,尤其是那些以怪物为特征的恐怖故事,这些怪物代表着被遗忘、被误解、被压制或被否认的历史片段。此外,通过研究《美国众神》和《糖果人》中的这种区域动态,本文发展了“适应性怪物”的概念,它描述了具有他们所适应的历史、文化和/或空间环境的象征性属性的可怕生物。总的来说,通过对《禁忌》、《糖果人》和《美国众神》的分析,本文展示了地区神话(尤其是中西部的神话)如何在恐怖叙事和文本形式中塑造怪物的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Horror Studies
Horror Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信