Mixed-sex civil partnerships and relationality: a perspective from law

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
A. Hayward
{"title":"Mixed-sex civil partnerships and relationality: a perspective from law","authors":"A. Hayward","doi":"10.1332/204674320x16062294691475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This year saw significant changes to the structure and regulation of adult formalised relationships in England and Wales. On New Year’s Eve 2019 mixed-sex couples became eligible to register civil partnerships and join same-sex couples who had been able to enter such status since the scheme’s introduction in December 2005. Operating in parallel with the long-established status of marriage, mixed-sex civil partnerships were the product of concerted activism, the introduction of multiple private member’s bills into parliament, and a Supreme Court decision in Steinfeld and Keidan v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. That landmark case involved a challenge by a mixed-sex couple who were ideologically opposed to marriage and believed registering a mixed-sex civil partnership would give effect to a more egalitarian expression of their relationship. They were, however, refused that ability on the basis that in accordance with the statutory framework they were not ‘of the same sex’. After a lengthy process of litigation, a unanimous Supreme Court declared the provisions in the Civil Partnership Act 2004 prohibiting mixed-sex civil partnerships discriminatory and incompatible with human rights law (see Hayward, 2019). This ruling prompted action by parliament in the form of the Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths (Registration etc.) Act 2019. Now that access to this regime is available for all couples, and thus in effect this jurisdiction operates a system of so-called ‘equal’ civil partnerships, questions now arise as to the future directions of this new status and its transformative potential for English family law. This article seeks to discover the lived experiences of those mixed-sex couples considering, registering, and enjoying civil partnerships. From the perspective of a legal academic specialising in domestic and comparative family law, this article will explore how mixed-sex civil partnerships are constituted by law and reflect on how that might influence couples’ experiences. Relationality, the core theme of this special edition, will also be considered, particularly when it is remembered that the very essence of a civil partnership is relational and, as with virtually all other civil union regimes operating elsewhere, dyadic. This focus will offer an opportunity to reflect on a key dispute in this area; namely, whether a system of mixed-sex civil partnerships can Families, Relationships and Societies","PeriodicalId":45141,"journal":{"name":"Families Relationships and Societies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Relationships and Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204674320x16062294691475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This year saw significant changes to the structure and regulation of adult formalised relationships in England and Wales. On New Year’s Eve 2019 mixed-sex couples became eligible to register civil partnerships and join same-sex couples who had been able to enter such status since the scheme’s introduction in December 2005. Operating in parallel with the long-established status of marriage, mixed-sex civil partnerships were the product of concerted activism, the introduction of multiple private member’s bills into parliament, and a Supreme Court decision in Steinfeld and Keidan v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. That landmark case involved a challenge by a mixed-sex couple who were ideologically opposed to marriage and believed registering a mixed-sex civil partnership would give effect to a more egalitarian expression of their relationship. They were, however, refused that ability on the basis that in accordance with the statutory framework they were not ‘of the same sex’. After a lengthy process of litigation, a unanimous Supreme Court declared the provisions in the Civil Partnership Act 2004 prohibiting mixed-sex civil partnerships discriminatory and incompatible with human rights law (see Hayward, 2019). This ruling prompted action by parliament in the form of the Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths (Registration etc.) Act 2019. Now that access to this regime is available for all couples, and thus in effect this jurisdiction operates a system of so-called ‘equal’ civil partnerships, questions now arise as to the future directions of this new status and its transformative potential for English family law. This article seeks to discover the lived experiences of those mixed-sex couples considering, registering, and enjoying civil partnerships. From the perspective of a legal academic specialising in domestic and comparative family law, this article will explore how mixed-sex civil partnerships are constituted by law and reflect on how that might influence couples’ experiences. Relationality, the core theme of this special edition, will also be considered, particularly when it is remembered that the very essence of a civil partnership is relational and, as with virtually all other civil union regimes operating elsewhere, dyadic. This focus will offer an opportunity to reflect on a key dispute in this area; namely, whether a system of mixed-sex civil partnerships can Families, Relationships and Societies
混合性别民事伴侣关系与关系:一个法律视角
今年,英格兰和威尔士的成人正式关系的结构和规则发生了重大变化。2019年新年前夕,混合性别伴侣有资格登记民事伴侣关系,并加入自2005年12月该计划推出以来能够获得这种身份的同性伴侣的行列。与长期确立的婚姻地位并行,混合性别民事伴侣关系是协同行动的产物,是向议会引入多个私人成员法案的产物,也是最高法院在斯坦菲尔德和凯丹诉国际发展大臣一案(2018年)UKSC 32中的判决的产物。这一具有里程碑意义的案件涉及一对同性伴侣的挑战,他们在意识形态上反对婚姻,并认为登记同性民事伴侣关系将使他们的关系更加平等。然而,他们被拒绝了这种能力,理由是根据法定框架,他们不是“同性”。经过漫长的诉讼过程,最高法院一致宣布《2004年民事伴侣法》中禁止男女混合民事伴侣关系的条款具有歧视性,与人权法不相容(见Hayward, 2019)。这一裁决促使议会以《2019年民事伴侣关系、婚姻和死亡(登记等)法》的形式采取行动。既然所有夫妻都可以使用这种制度,因此实际上这个司法管辖区运作着一种所谓的“平等”民事伴侣关系体系,那么现在就出现了关于这种新地位的未来方向及其对英国家庭法的变革潜力的问题。本文旨在发现那些考虑、登记和享受民事伴侣关系的混合性伴侣的生活经历。本文将从一个专门研究国内和比较家庭法的法律学者的角度,探讨男女混合的民事伴侣关系是如何由法律构成的,并反思这可能如何影响夫妻的经历。关系,这一特别版的核心主题,也将被考虑,特别是当人们记住,民事伙伴关系的本质是关系的,并且与几乎所有其他地方运作的民事结合制度一样,是二元的。这种关注将提供一个机会来反思这一领域的一个关键争议;也就是说,一个男女混合的民事伴侣制度是否能够解决家庭、人际关系和社会问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Families, Relationships and Societies (FRS) is a vibrant social science journal advancing scholarship and debates in the field of families and relationships. It explores family life, relationships and generational issues across the life course. Bringing together a range of social science perspectives, with a strong policy and practice focus, it is also strongly informed by sociological theory and the latest methodological approaches. The title ''Families, Relationships and Societies'' encompasses the fluidity, complexity and diversity of contemporary social and personal relationships and their need to be understood in the context of different societies and cultures. International and comprehensive in scope, FRS covers a range of theoretical, methodological and substantive issues, from large scale trends, processes of social change and social inequality to the intricacies of family practices. It welcomes scholarship based on theoretical, qualitative or quantitative analysis. High quality research and scholarship is accepted across a wide range of issues. Examples include family policy, changing relationships between personal life, work and employment, shifting meanings of parenting, issues of care and intimacy, the emergence of digital friendship, shifts in transnational sexual relationships, effects of globalising and individualising forces and the expansion of alternative ways of doing family. Encouraging methodological innovation, and seeking to present work on all stages of the life course, the journal welcomes explorations of relationships and families in all their different guises and across different societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信