Evaluation of the Attitudes of Anesthesia Residents and Specialists in Patients Who Have Had COVID-19 Before Elective Surgery

Q4 Medicine
Oya Kale
{"title":"Evaluation of the Attitudes of Anesthesia Residents and Specialists in Patients Who Have Had COVID-19 Before Elective Surgery","authors":"Oya Kale","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2022.69335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the knowledge and opinions and increase awareness of anesthesia residents and specialists about the timing of elective surgery of patients who have had COVID-19. Methods: After the approval of the hospital ethics committee, the link of the questionnaire form was sent to the anesthesia residents and specialist online via e-mail and social media application (WhatsApp mobile application). Questions were asked regarding demographic data, sources of information regarding COVID-19 infection, timing of elective surgery, preoperative preparation and risk factors, and informed consent. Results: In the study, 78% were specialist physicians, 66% were in the 30-50 age range and 63% were female of the 174 participants. The most used resource was the Ministry of Health Guidelines (79% specialist, 63% resident). Among the information sources used, hospital and in-clinic training, World Health Organization website and scientific publications responses were significantly different between the groups (p=0.002;p=0.015 and p=0.013). The times of taking elective surgery after COVID-19;While the responses of specialists and residents were significantly different in asymptomatic patients, they were found to be similar in patients with symptomatic disease at home, symptomatic in hospital and in intensive care unit. Conclusion: Responses of specialists and residents about the timing of the operation;while it was significantly different in asymptomatic patients, it was found to be similar in those who had symptomatic disease at home and in the hospital and those who had admitted to intensive care.","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2022.69335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the knowledge and opinions and increase awareness of anesthesia residents and specialists about the timing of elective surgery of patients who have had COVID-19. Methods: After the approval of the hospital ethics committee, the link of the questionnaire form was sent to the anesthesia residents and specialist online via e-mail and social media application (WhatsApp mobile application). Questions were asked regarding demographic data, sources of information regarding COVID-19 infection, timing of elective surgery, preoperative preparation and risk factors, and informed consent. Results: In the study, 78% were specialist physicians, 66% were in the 30-50 age range and 63% were female of the 174 participants. The most used resource was the Ministry of Health Guidelines (79% specialist, 63% resident). Among the information sources used, hospital and in-clinic training, World Health Organization website and scientific publications responses were significantly different between the groups (p=0.002;p=0.015 and p=0.013). The times of taking elective surgery after COVID-19;While the responses of specialists and residents were significantly different in asymptomatic patients, they were found to be similar in patients with symptomatic disease at home, symptomatic in hospital and in intensive care unit. Conclusion: Responses of specialists and residents about the timing of the operation;while it was significantly different in asymptomatic patients, it was found to be similar in those who had symptomatic disease at home and in the hospital and those who had admitted to intensive care.
择期手术前麻醉住院医师和专科医师对COVID-19患者态度的评价
目的:评价麻醉住院医师和专科医师对新冠肺炎患者择期手术时机的认识和意见,提高他们的择期手术意识。方法:经医院伦理委员会批准后,将问卷表格的链接通过电子邮件和社交媒体应用程序(WhatsApp移动应用程序)在线发送给麻醉住院医师和专科医生。问题涉及人口统计数据、COVID-19感染的信息来源、择期手术的时机、术前准备和风险因素以及知情同意。结果:在174名参与者中,78%是专科医生,66%在30-50岁之间,63%是女性。使用最多的资源是卫生部指南(79%是专家,63%是居民)。在使用的信息来源中,医院和诊所培训、世界卫生组织网站和科学出版物的反应在两组之间存在显著差异(p=0.002;p=0.015和p=0.013)。在无症状患者中,专科医生和住院医生的反应有显著差异,而在有症状的家庭、有症状的医院和重症监护病房患者中,专科医生和住院医生的反应相似。结论:专家和住院医师对手术时机的反应,无症状患者有显著差异,在家和在医院有症状的患者与重症监护患者有相似之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信